Yes James; our protocol was for topical use only.
Be well. Brooks.
"James Osbourne, Holmes" wrote:
> Hi Brooks,
>
> Thanks for the continuing stream of very interesting and highly useful
> information.
>
> Is the honey/cs/antibiotic mix for topical use only?
>
> Thank you in advance,
>
> James Osbourne Holmes
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: BROOKS BRADLEY [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 9:37 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: CS>Honey: Info on Adjunctive Protocols
>
> To all interested list members:
> There is a splendid article in the OCT/2000 issue of The New
> Scientist. The article reveals some of the latest documentation on the
> use of honey (especially the New Zealand Manuka) for the treatment of
> antibiotic resistant pathogens encountered in septic wounds and
> non-healing ulcers. The mechanism of continuous renewal of the
> micro-level H202 fraction---is to say the least---fascinating.
> The single proviso cautioned by the main-stream researchers,
> related to a caution against the possibility of botulinum spores being
> in some honeys.
> I could not resist a mild smirk of satisfaction, comforted
> by the knowledge of our past researches demonstrating the effectivity of
> low percentage (5 ppm) CS in controlling botulinum spores. It is
> regretable these researchers are unaware of this simple
> modification---which would inactivate the necessity for their
> "voice-of-doom" pronouncement against ANY simple householder attempting
> to employ a home-grown protocol.......instead; ALL are cautioned to
> allow ONLY trained professionals to execute this 4500 year old
> protocol.....originated by untaught savages.
> In our experimental researches (some years earlier) we
> determined that as little as 10% CS (5ppm) was sufficient to suppress
> Botulinum--- in all liquid mediums tested---within 6 to 10 minutes (at
> room temperatures).
> The article is well worth looking up. I would have sent
> it as a copied attachment; but such would violate the magazine's
> copyright protections.
> Sincerely. Brooks Bradley.
> p.s. I might add that the most effective protocol we ever
> tested---for high-grade and/or persistant ear infections (in a variety
> of higher mammals), included the following basics:
> CS (10 ppm) 60%; unprocessed/unheated honey 20%; DMSO
> (full strength) 10%; compatible antibiotic (e.g. Penicillin G) 10%.
> These are by volume measures. Do remember that some complexed/mixed
> antibiotics such as Penicillin-Di-hydrostreptomycin [ the old
> Combiotic] can have a devastating effect upon the hearing of some large
> mammals---ESPECIALLLY HUMAN BEINGS. Therefore, all would be well-served
> to KNOW that any antibiotic they were considering applying into the ear
> of an experimental subject, was completely safe from complicating
> side-effects.. Some General Practicioners (M.D.s) appear not to be
> completely up-to-date on the Tables of Toxicity (especially relative to
> some of the secondary effects), but most Pharmacists seem to be.
> Do be advised this information is not to be construed as any
> form of medical advice----instead, being merely a synopsis of some of
> our experimental experiences relating to our research programs.
>
> --
> The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
>
> To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to:
> [email protected] -or- [email protected]
> with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.
>
> To post, address your message to: [email protected]
> Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
> List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
