Our attempts to explore alternative health considerations has, at its bottom line, preserving the quality of life. Occasionally, someone comes along with an insight that seems a little off the usual beaten path or "illuminates" the bottom line from another perspective. This just came in to me, impressed me, and seems worthy of passing along to you as information. However, if you want to vent any opposing opinions, let's take them off site : Robert Bartell
> Paul Harvey on Gun Control > > Are you considering backing gun control laws? Do you think that because you > may not own a gun, the rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment don't matter? > CONSIDER: > In 1929 the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, > approximately 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were > rounded up and exterminated. > > In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915-1917, 1.5 million > Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. > > Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million > Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, the mentally ill, and others, who were unable to > defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. > > China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million > political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and > exterminated. > > Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan > Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. > > Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 > Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. > > Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million > "educated" people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and > exterminated. > > That places total victims who lost their lives because of gun control at > approximately 56 million in the last century. > > Since we should learn from the mistakes of history, the next time someone > talks in favor of gun control, find out which group of citizens they wish to > have exterminated. > > It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced to > surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed, a program costing the > government more than $500 million dollars. The results Australia-wide: > Homicides are up 3.2%; assaults are up 8 %; armed robberies are up 44%. In > that country's state of Victoria, homicides with firearms are up 300%. Over > the previous 25 years, figures show a steady decrease in armed robberies and > Australian politicians are on the spot and at a loss to explain how no > improvement in "safety" has been observed after such monumental effort and > expense was successfully expended in "ridding society of guns." > > It's time to state it plainly; Guns in the hands of honest citizens save > lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws only affect the law-abiding > citizens. Take action before it's too late, write or call your delegation. > > OPINION: Paul Harvey on Guns > > Paul Harvey's comment on Columbine High shootings: > > How can we blame it all on guns? For the life of me, I can't understand what > could have gone wrong in Littleton, CO. If only the parents had kept their > children away from the guns, we wouldn't have had such a tragedy. > Yeah, it must have been the guns. > > It couldn't have been because half our children are being raised in broken > homes. > > It couldn't have been because our children get to spend an average of 30 > seconds in meaningful conversation with their parents each day. After all, we > give our children quality time. > > It couldn't have been because we treat our children as pets and our pets as > children. > > It couldn't have been because we place our children in day care centers where > they learn their socialization skills among their peers under the law of the > jungle while employees who have no vested interest in the children look on > and make sure that no blood is spilled. > > It couldn't have been because we allow our children to watch, on the average, > seven hours of television a day filled with the glorification of sex and > violence that isn't fit for adult consumption. > > It couldn't have been because we allow our children to enter into virtual > worlds in which, to win the game, one must kill as many opponents as possible > in the most sadistic way possible. > > It couldn't have been because we have sterilized and concentrated our > families down to sizes so small that the children we do have are so spoiled > with material things that they come to equate the receiving of the material > with love. > > It couldn't have been because our children, who historically have been seen > as a blessing from God, are now being viewed as either a mistake created when > contraception fails or inconveniences that parents try to raise in their > spare time. > > It couldn't have been because we teach our children that there are no laws of > morality that transcend us, that everything is relative and that actions > don't have consequences. > > What the heck, the president gets away with it. > > Nah, it must have been the guns. > > Paul Harvey
