"Judith Thamm" <[email protected]> writes:
> Dear Russ,
> Putting this into much simpler language, there is an old and often
> quoted folk tale that it is dangerous for a very young person whose
> strength of mind is undeveloped to be in the room touching an 
> elderly
> strong willed extremely ill person; the ill person was considered 
> able
> to 'steal' the strength and health away from the young unsuspecting
> person.

I didn't order the e-book, which might address this issue, but there's
something I wondered about that wasn't covered in the excerpts Duncan
posted:  Suppose the quantum of inductor tissue is *finite*, and thus
*transferred* to the receptor; do the two tissues' health states tend to
equalize? or is inductor tissue's health multiplied, like lighting many
torches from one?  Dr. John Ray says energetic healers often die from
cancers for failure to seek a proportional amount of personal attention. 
Would one's hand become cancerous as the colon improved?  The excerpts
noted the effects on the receptor exclusively, but it would be
interesting to monitor the inductor tissue for any corresponding
degradation.  

--Russ

> Judith.
> 
> > Duncan's fascinating article posits that healthy tissue can act as 
> a
> LENS
> > or FILTER to pre-condition a magnetic field for optimal effect on
> > afflicted tissue of the same type.
> >
> > Since lower & upper mT limits are mentioned, the conversion rate 
> to
> Gauss
> > is needed.
> >
> > Thus far, people have focused on the effects of magnetic fields on
> > tissue.  Conversely, the BET theory invites study into how tissue
> affects
> > magnetic fields!  Perhaps magetic fields can be used to transduce
> (or
> > heterodyne) the informational content of Kirlian auras into more
> > quantifiable forms, and open up a new, 'bio-informational' lexicon
> > (analogous to Rife frequency tables).  Identifying & reproducing 
> the
> > electromagnetic pulse of "health" might engender a new generation 
> of
> > biomagnetic devices.
> >
> > Noting how much of the article is theoretic and interpretive, I 
> see
> other
> > questions as implicit:  What other energy forms might also serve 
> as
> > information carriers--DC current passing through one's hand in
> series
> > with an infected area?  The article doesn't suggest passing a
> magnetic
> > field through a healthy person's body to the corresponding part of 
> a
> > patient's body, perhaps because of the 2-3 cm rule.  However,
> distance
> > would not impede the conduction of *electrical current* from a
> healthy
> > subject's liver to that of a patient.  RATHER THAN DONATING 
> ORGANS,
> WE
> > MIGHT BE ABLE TO SHARE OPTIMAL ORGAN *STATES*.  Also, what *kinds*
> of
> > information are transmissible from the "inductor" tissue, besides
> its
> > health state--perhaps the mental will or attititude of its owner?
> How
> > much of what's passed along is physiological, and how much 
> reflects
> the
> > owners' *perception* of its condition?  For that matter, could
> current or
> > a magnetic field or an electrical field convey *thoughts* from 
> head
> A to
> > contiguous head B?
> >
> > Answering these questions might resolve a mystery that's been on 
> my
> mind
> > for several years:
> >
> > I know of two figures who have challenged the orthodox notion that
> DNA is
> > the prime determinant of one's health potential: 1) Dr. John Ray,
> who has
> > claimed not only that bodies can be healed by enhancing their
> alignment
> > with DNA instructions, but further that the quality of one's DNA
> > blueprint can be enhanced, in turn, by improving its fidelity to 
> an
> > etheric, *Body Electronics* paradigm; and 2) Dr. Bruce Lipton, who
> has
> > argued that f the *cellular environment* (incl. emotional) is
> primal
> > because it prompts the cell to create whatever DNA is needed to
> provide
> > instructions that the cell then obeys.  Both seem to indicate that
> the
> > body's essence is information, and that our infirmities consist of
> > garbled translation between this transcendental model its 
> corporeal
> > expression (and/or between successive generations of corporeal 
> DNA).
> > Suppose all informational souls share common factors or
> > 'commands'--"HEALTH", for example--which could be
> electromagnetically
> > restored.  Inasmuch as this parameter is individuated, perhaps
> HEALTH is
> > a ratio of electromagnetic values that could be adjusted
> energetically,
> > ocne they were tabulated.
> >
> > --Russ
> >
> >
> > --
> > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal
> silver.
> >
> > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail 
> message
> to:
> > [email protected]  -or-
> [email protected]
> > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.
> >
> > To post, address your message to: [email protected]
> > Silver-list archive:
> http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
> > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
> >
>