> One of the reasons I shared Dr. Jon's email was his reference to asking > Frank Key about CS. Frank- do you know this guy? > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Solar" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 6:16 AM > Subject: CS>Re[2]: CS>Fw: Dr. Jon's Colloidal Silver and Blind Pigs 5-8-01 > > > > Hello List, > > > > Beverle, I feel that some of the issues you bring up are valid, and do > > need addressed. Hopefully I can clarify some of these. > > > > I have NO problem with Dr. Jon Brooks emailing out the information > > that he did. I agree that many, many more people will now become > > interested in colloidal silver, which is a good thing. What I DO have > > a problem with is the way he writes his email letters. He seems to > > speak as if he is the ultimate authority on the subject. And, believe > > me, this has NOTHING to do with ego! It has to do with FACTS versus > > disinformation. The thing that bothers me is that we will now have > > 20,000 new "experts" running around, espousing how colloidal silver > > made by ANY method other than Dr. Jon's doesn't work. And that, > > simply, is not true. > > > > In his last emailing about colloidal silver, Dr. Jon tries to stress > > that, no matter how well made, ALL colloidal silver just plain won't > > work on a virus. BUT...... With the new "frankenstein" process that he > > has found out about, IT WILL! He pretty much relegates all other CS to > > the status of "snake oil". While I agree that many multi-level > > marketers are selling trash, that certainly doesn't mean that all CS > > available is trash! Oh, and before someone makes some type of > > assumption, I don't sell CS, except to a few close friends. The fact > > of the matter is that, if Dr. Jon wanted to find out a lot about > > colloidal silver, the various ways to make it, the successes and > > failures, etc., he only need find this list, which isn't that hard to > > do. > > > > As for the technical discussions that take place here from time to > > time, I can assure you that no one is trying to show off their > > intellect. There are some very valid, simple questions that as of yet > > have no simple answers. We are all searching for the same result, > > which is the truth. The "technical types" around here would LOVE to > > establish a very simple, fast, and efficient protocol that would > > produce the best colloidal silver possible. Something very simple and > > easy to operate, that costs next to nothing. That is, for the most > > part, what all of the technical discussion boils down to. > > > > As for not knowing where to start, asking questions is ALWAYS the > > place to start! Unlike Dr. Jon, who states "I haven't the time for > > hand holding", you will find that everyone here, including the > > "technical types", are more than willing to answer even the most basic > > questions. Ole Bob goes so far as to even tell you Radio Shack part > > numbers! > > > > Until the day comes that the tests are all run and the questions all > > answered, there will continue to be technical discussion. And most > > members of this list will probably prefer to ignore those discussions. > > That is fine. But, keep in mind that those discussions are not meant > > to show greatness or belittle! They exist only to exchange ideas and > > results. That is, after all, what this list is about, isn't it? > > > > > > Best regards, > > Solar mailto:[email protected] > > > > > > > > -- > > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > > > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: > > [email protected] -or- [email protected] > > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > > > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > > >
