Hi Brooks, Marshall and list, I went to the link and see they want $80 each for these LED's. WHEW are they proud of those little buggars!!!!! You can get 3000 mcd LED's at 20 milliamperes for 50 cents apiece (LED-50). A couple of dollars worth wired in parallel would be a much better deal and have more output. http://www.allelectronics.com/pdf/led.pdf
I suspect they peak around 660 nanometers. Couldn't determine for sure but most red ones do. Trem ----- Original Message ----- From: Marshall Dudley To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 11:17 AM Subject: Re: CS>OT:INTERESTING ANCILLARY PROTOCOL You might find this interesting. 11,000 mcd at 660 nm when driven at 100 mA. http://www.roithner.de/All_Datasheets/LEDs%20Super%20High%20Power/SH660_20.PDF Marshall BROOKS BRADLEY wrote: > To all interested llist members. > Recently, we completed a series of evaluations which > yielded VERY substantial results. These evaluations were a continuation > of earlier protocols employing LED units in experimenting for effective > protocols. One protocol, IN PARTICULAR.....gave particularly > efficacious results. This, experimental protocol, involved the > application of 660 nm red-spectrum light, (via both 5 bulb portable and > larger, more powerful non-portable units). The weakest bulbs to yield > high-quality results were on the order of 3500 mcd ( 5 bulbs arranged in > a compact, circular assembly). The most rapid results were achieved > with a much higher -powered (non-portable) unit of our own design and > construction. This latter unit possesses a tissue-penetration > capability of greater than 8 " -----for lean-muscle tissue. However, > VERY ACCEPTABLE results were gained from the simple...low-powered unit. > The actual protocol was as simple as it was > effective. The procedure involved placing the light-source transducer > directly over the navel (actually touching the skin with the low-powered > unit in many cases) and maintaining for periods varying from 20 to 60 > minutes per exposure. Since human cells maintain a self-determining > control response over "diffused light", there was no danger of > contravening effects arising from over-exposure or excessive > high-intensity light concentrations. The beneficial effects----and > there were several----accrue from the fact that the aorta lies DIRECTLY > behind the navel. This circumstance allows complete exposure to the > circulating blood supply----in very short order. > I will not, at this time, elaborate on exactly > what we were evaluating, but do relate that this experimental protocol > proved to be EXCEPTIONALLY safe----and effective on a number of > blood-borne pathogens------in VERY SHORT time periods (e.g. 2 hours, in > some cases). Effectiveness was monitored ---in vitro---via continuing, > sequential blood extractions on the venous side. > The advantages of this type of protocol should > appear obvious to many on this list. It appears to be effective, swift, > economical-----and simple to accomplish. Additionally, it promises a > useful tool for an astonishingly small cost. While, obviously, not a > panacea........this simple experimental approach promises an effective > ancillary address-----for some very serious conditions. > Sincerely, Brooks > Bradley. > p.s. Much of the visual evaluation was accomplished in > ----essentially---- real time, using dark-field microscopy. > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: > [email protected] -or- [email protected] > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
