Oh yes, of course. I must have been doing higher math. :-) Ken Introducing a new term to the language... The "Sagan" : a unit of measurement indicating billions and billions and billions.....
At 11:35 AM 6/28/01 -0400, you wrote: >I had been told that there really wan't any word for the many, instead they would >throw up their hands and have a helpless look on their faces once they got beyond >3. > >Marshall > >Ode Coyote wrote: > >> Isn't that "One, a couple, a few, several" then many? >> >> Nit picking math.. >> er, one nit is two-many :-) >> How's that for an equation? >> Ken >> >> At 04:55 PM 6/27/01 -0400, you wrote: >> >Roger wrote: >> > >> >> Frank: I would appreciate it if you could cite the references that support >> >> your statement, "Many researchers are convinced that very small particles >> >> (under 10 nm) in high concentration is most desired." Thanks, Roger >> > >> >In the aboriginal number systems, many comes after three (as in one, two, >> three, many), so I only need to find one more beyond myself, Dr. Maass, and >> Dr. Gibbs. Perhaps Marshall will sign on. >> > >> >frank key >> > >> > >> >-- >> >The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. >> > >> >To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: >> >[email protected] -or- [email protected] >> >with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. >> > >> >To post, address your message to: [email protected] >> >Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html >> >List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> >> > >> > > >
