Reid, "reasons DC CS might not be effective?"
The only thing I can think of is the fact that DC CS is unlikely to make anyone rich. Best Regards, Arnold ----- Original Message ----- From: "Reid Harvey" <[email protected]> To: "silver digest" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:50 PM Subject: CS>AC CS vs. DC CS > All, > Some weeks ago someone here said that there had been information from > the Center for Colloidal Science, to the effect they had never tested a > DC CS that was effective. I've tried to contact the center, but am > being told by a University of Delaware dean that the Center for > Colloidal Science has been dis-established, owing to the death of its > director. (I really regret the loss of the center, but under the > circumstances do not wish to appear tasteless by continuing, speaking > 'antidisestablishmentarianistically.' Forgive me, but I've never before > had a chance to properly use this word.) > > In ANY event, can someone please repeat for this old dullard the reasons > DC CS might not be effective? > Thanks in advance. > Reid > > > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: > [email protected] -or- [email protected] > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
