In a message dated 9/30/2001 7:02:07 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:
> Subj:CS>Re: temperature > Date:9/30/2001 7:02:07 AM Eastern Daylight Time > From: [email protected] (Reid Harvey) > Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]</A> > To: [email protected] (silver digest) > > > > > CSEnthusiasts, > It would seem to me, given the fact most here agree that there is no > excess dosage of CS, that using heated water and other techniques > implicit is a very prudent, cost effective way of getting the material > to more of the many people who need it. It would be a great luxury for > a lot of poor, far beyond their means, to imagine they could make their > own, somewaht more effective, 10ppm CS. > > The only real disadvantage I can see is that the slightly larger CS > coming from the concentrated material may not get to all the places in > the body that the smaller material will go. Maybe the larger stuff will > go to only 90 to 95% of what the smaller will do? Otherwise it is absurd > to think that the real advantage is that one would be drinking, say > 100ml. of smaller particle CS, vs. 200ml or the larger, for example. > > It is very tempting to think that it's yet another 'pissing contest,' > somebody feeling economically threatened. Let's think about those who > would not otherwise get the CS. If I appear to be posturing for this > goal it is because I'm already committed to CS saturated water purifiers > for the poor. After all, the world is more desperate than ever for real > solutions to the many problems. > Reid > Reid: It is going to take some time before we will be able to show that one form of CS is better that another and even then such information may be for a specific illness. In the meantime, use the KISS principle, but stay away from salt since that compound will drastically lower the ionic portion of the total "CS". Roger
