In a message dated 9/30/2001 1:32:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:
> Roger, > > My "clever remark" is meant in the best possible way and please note it was > made only to you personally, off list. I have no problem with the math. I > will not critique your work in this area as I consider myself a chemical > ignoramus. I am interested in advancing the CS cause but I can only do so > in the area of electronics and perhaps process control. I must rely on > you, Ivan (who I suspect will be we will be hearing from on this) and > Frank. If you fellows ever agree on a safe, repeatable and economical > method of making effective CS, I will be able to help to make it a reality. > Until then, I remain, lurkingly yours, > > Arnold > Arnold: Sorry. It was only after I whisked off my hasty reply that I thought that I may have misinterpreted your remark. In the meantime, I would like to put 3 or more scientifically minded individuals together to go through the details of the calculation, step by step. I promise it WILL be fun. Let me know if you want to participate, and again sorry to have responded the way I did. I guess I'm a little touchy about the lack of interest in something that I think is quite useful and instructive. Roger
