In a message dated 10/19/2001 8:33:08 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:
> Subj:CS Benefit > Date:10/19/2001 8:33:08 AM Eastern Daylight Time > From: [email protected] (Gil DiSanto) > Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]</A> > To: [email protected] > > > > > There are a lot of questions and comments about quality and consistency and > the many different tools and techniques used to make CS. > > For us home brew folks, we are faces with a lot of variables like the purity > of the silver, purity and content of the water, type and amount of volts and > amps, and probably some I am leaving off. > > Isn't the bottom line here that some form of CS is better than none? > > I realize that absorption differs based on particle size, but for many of > the home brewer types like me, I am reluctant to buy either the equipment or > lab services to verify the ppm, particle size, etc. > > I bought a Silver-gen system. I know it's making CS, and I believe the > manufacturer's claims because I've experienced some good results from the CS > I've made. But many build there own much less expensive battery generators, > and are also getting possitive results. > > If I were selling my CS on the open market, then I need to be able to > provide some assurance as to the quality to my customers. But to all of us > that make CS for non-commercial use, the only thing I want to know is if I > am making something that will do more harm than good. > > Gil > Gil: I don't think there is evidence that ANY form of electrochemically prepared CS is harmful, and, equally important, I don't think that there is evidence, YET, that one form of electrochemically prepared CS is better than any other. Roger
