CS Friends and Lovers, THIS JUMPED OUT AT ME from Dr. Robert Beck's FAQs. Am I just dumb or why didn't I get the implications before? Dr. Beck says: "....today the FDA is attempting to subvert the grandfather clause and is seeking to gain approval status over the use and production of colloidal silver on the outrageous premise that since colloidal silver has proven to be such an effective broad spectrum germ fighter in its ability to cure new strains of bacteria (not in existence in 1938), that its use should be subject to their jurisdiction!"
Doesn't this mean we don't all need to break our backs to prove to somebody that CS is effective? So in reality the FDA is simply picking and choosing their response according to audience, thus talking out of two sides of the mouth. For example, from one side of the mouth they tell those with health concerns about argyria. From the other side they tell drug company investors, etc., that CS is a broad spectrum germ fighter and very effective. Maybe I'm just catching on, but it looks like the bad guys are afraid of the consequences of just plain starting up production, since, the status quo being what it is they'd be giving legitimacy to the small producers. It appears to me that when confronting journalists like those recently seen from the Orlando Sentinel, All Things Considered and others, what we really need to present them with is the FDA's own inside information that they view CS as a 'broad spectrum germ fighter.' Reid, too flabbergasted to come up with a founder's patriotic quote. -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: [email protected] -or- [email protected] with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
