Hi all,

I will be attending a talk to be given by William Briggs, author of a book
on CS (don't know the title), to be held here in Perth on Nov 26. I was
invited, separately, by a couple of different friends, both of whom I have
talked to extensively about the virtues of CS. Because of this I did a
little net searching on William Briggs and found a site that appears to be
closely associated with him, the "Compassion Response Network":

http://www.nw.com.au/%7Ekeane/healing/02CSHealthSafety/00index2.htm

What I found was quite a number of, in my opinion, inaccuracies and half
truths. I may be doing Mr Briggs an injustice by assuming that the
statements are linked to him and, if that is not so, I apologise totally.
If, however, these are really related to his ideas then I would like to be
sure of my facts before my friends are exposed to his talk.

Could those with a reasonable grasp of the following issues, selected from
the various web pages on the site, please comment on them accordingly?
Also, anyone who has read his book may be able to discern if these are
similar concepts to those he has written.

BTW, at one point Bill Briggs is described as "Australia's leading authority
on colloidal silver".

On colloids, ions and salts:

"A Particulate Test, or Specific Ion Test. This test measures only colloidal
(that is, ionic) silver, and can be expressed as ppm of colloidal silver"

"Pure water itself does not conduct an electron flow, but ions (colloidal
particles) and salts are good conductors for electron flow."

     I thought ions (Ag+) and colloidal particles were different.


On what is formed when making CS:

"with most products, show that about 80% of the silver content is in silver
salts or compounds."

"Silver sinters off from the anode, forming either positively charged silver
colloid particles, or combining with any salts or compounds in the water,
forming silver chloride, silver nitrate, silver iodide or various other
silver compounds depending upon the salts and impurities originally in the
water."

"Even most of the genuinely "electro-colloidal" solutions contained about
80% silver salts, and some of these were in such high concentrations, or
using toxic salts such as silver nitrate, that regular taking of them over
years could lead to severe silver toxaemia and perhaps even diagnosed
argyria."

    More on "positively charged" next, but is ionic silver (the 80%) the
same as silver salts or compounds?


On absorption (adsorption?) and associated charge:

"Colloidal silver and silver salts however, because of their positive
charge, are repelled by the intestinal lining, which therefore does not
admit such positively charged particles to be adsorbed into the blood
stream."

"But in the mouth and throat, the Ph balance is definitely alkaline, and
under such situations, the positively charged silver colloid is rapidly
adsorbed, that is, attracted and assimilated by the negatively charged
mineral elements in the blood."

    I was under the impression that, while the ions had a positive valence,
the colloidal particles were negatively charged.


On argyria and heavy metals:

"The sad danger in commercial preparations for silver medications and
"colloidal" solutions, and also for home colloidal silver preparations, is
that there are many not doing the rigorous checks during preparation
required to ensure safety and quality, and there seems to be emerging a
group of people with substantial heavy metal (silver) toxicity, as serious
in its own way as the recent concern about mercury toxicity."

"Some of these more extreme cases are developing acute argyria, and the wave
of such cases is already apparent."

"Thefact is, that pure colloidal silver never settles in the body tissues,
because it is too small, and so never contributes to argyria."

"Medical authorities differ on how much silver causes argyria, and of course
different silver salts vary in their toxicity. Let us consider the
proposition that 1 gram of silver ingested over a year will give rise to
argyria (medical authorities differ, but 1/2 gram to 1 gram of silver is
often regarded as sufficient, when taken over a year, to cause argyria).
----
Let us then calculate how much silver we would ingest taking 5mls (a
teaspoon) a day of a preparation containing 4 ppm of silver salts.
----
Now taking 5 mls of solution a day for 365 days = 1825 mls or 1.825/250 =
0.73% of the quantity (1 gram) required to cause argyria. Or 1.46% of 1/2 a
gram over a year."

"But even silver accumulation in the body of a lesser degree than that which
leads to medical diagnosis of argyria is serious, as it congests the body
with a heavy metal, inhibiting proper body functioning. We may compare the
situation of silver toxaemia with that of mercury toxaemia produced by the
widespread dental use of amalgam fillings that include mercury and silver."

"Even most of the genuinely "electro-colloidal" solutions contained about
80% silver salts, and some of these were in such high concentrations, or
using toxic salts such as silver nitrate, that regular taking of them over
years could lead to severe silver toxaemia and perhaps even diagnosed
argyria."

"The result is that recently there have been a growing number of argyria
cases coming to medical attention; now argyria is once again a recognised
illness in our society."

    I didn't think silver was considered a heavy metal, and where are the
"wave" of argyria cases?


On silver nitrate, light and silver solubility:

"A few of selected samples of commercial colloidal silver were very high in
silver nitrate, indicating that to prepare the solution, the silver
electrodes were immersed not into water, but into a nitrate solution."

Silver nitrate is sensitive to the entire visible light spectrum, whereas
colloidal silver is mainly sensitive (that is it loses its positive charge
and precipitates out) to ultra violet light."

Silver colloids are fat soluble, whereas silver compounds and salts are
water soluble. Silver salts such as silver nitrate or silver chloride will
precipitate out in fat cells, and in this way build up in the body."

    I'm not sure at all about the above statements.


There are many more statements on the site that I would question, but these
are enough for me now.

I am not sure what the Briggs talk will be about, but I suspect commercial
intent. I believe he is part of a group that intends going to Africa and
injecting 50,000 AIDs sufferers with IV colloidal silver. Although I may
question the transmission method, I do heartily applaud such an undertaking.

I hope I'm wrong about his link to this site, but if not I suspect I may
have to ask a few pointed questions at his talk. If that is the case, it
will probably make both of us quite uncomfortable.

Regards,

Mike Fuller


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: 
[email protected]  -or-  [email protected]
with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.

To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>