Greetings, I would also be interested in the conversion to something more easily used for us regular folk:)
Regards, Craig Jim Meissner wrote: > > Dear Group: > > Would someone please translate Brooks Bradley's fascinating post about Kelp. > I am over 60, so I think this may be applicable. > > I am guessing that 11 oz of kelp powder is "11 oz. dry weight" mixed into 1 > gallon of water? > (It does not like to mix!) > > Then I would like to make 32 oz batches. If 2 table spoons for 1 gallon, > then it would be 1/2 table spoon for 32 oz of water? > > Now if I wanted to add 20% CS that would be 6 oz CS and 26 oz of water and > 1/2 table spoon of concentrate? > > Is that right so far? > > Now when he talks about Celtic sea salt I get lost. > > Can this be translated into how many teaspoons per 32 oz? > > All you chemists are probably laughing, but ....... > > Juergen P. (Jim) Meissner > Check out my Website at www.MeissnerResearch.com > Read about the benefits of the Brain State Synchronizer sounds for improving > your life and health. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: BROOKS BRADLEY <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:30 PM > Subject: CS>POSSIBLY USEFUL PROTOCOL INVOLVING KELP EXTRACTS > > > The recent animal-related posts jogged my failing memory > > into recalling some interesting....and I believe, useful investigations > > we conducted some time in the past. These endeavors revolved about the > > possible efficacy of "kelp-based solutions" for nutritional support and > > disease prevention/abatement in animal pets and livestock. Our results > > were VERY encouraging. > > The most efficacious protocol was as follows: > > Starting with a concentrated solution of kelp (seaweed) > > extract [ approx. 11 ounces of soluble powder in 1 gallon of water], we > > used 2 tablespoons CONCENTRATE diluted in 1 gallon of water......as the > > basic mixture. Our goal was to evaluate the benefits---if any---of > > using this material as a nutritional support and/or a disease prevention > > modality for domestic pets and livestock. The beneficial results > > exceeded our expectations. In chickens furnished this solution free > > choice, NO significant nutritional-based deficiencies were > > detectable(less than .1%)......with them receiving 3 different > > commercial feed mixtures. Among controls, a background pathogenic level > > of 5% was a constant....and in some cases outbreaks of varying pathogens > > expressed as high as 20%...on occasion. Among "purposely infected" > > groups, naturally -occurring recovery/resistance spontaneously > > established (lowering mortality from 60% to 10%) when the kelp solutions > > were administered as the sole source of liquid intake AFTER THE > > INFECTION. The speed and completeness of recovery was noticeably > > enhanced when the parent solution was diluted 20%, by volume, with 10 > > ppm CS. This in spite of contentions/suspicions of antagonisms between > > the silver colloid and the parent solution substances. Among subjects > > furnished access to the Kelp X CS combination solution, we were able to > > infect...via direct injection....less than 2% of the subjects----and the > > resulting insults were, in almost all cases, quite mild. Mortality was > > less than .05%. > > Our results among dogs, cats, and birds.....were equally > > impressive; although the physical number of subjects was much smaller. > > We did encounter some difficulty in getting cats to drink water > > containing this level of kelp.....at least in the beginning. The only > > successful method involved maintaining them in cages.....during the > > evaluations. > > At the time of these experiments we did not utilize MSM, > > vitamin supports, fluid electrolyte enhancement, etc. > > A rather fascinating byline relating to this type > > investigation is that a similar modality involving human volunteers > > (older subjects....beyond 60) yielded superior results----when employing > > a somewhat modified version----for individuals suffering from a variety > > of chronic expressions. The principal modification involved a second > > dilution of the kelp X CS with 25%, by volume, of complete sea-solid > > solution (reduced from 35,000 ppm to 8750 ppm). The sea solid solution > > may be constructed using any acceptable FULL SPECTRUM source (e.g. > > Celtic Sea Salt, etc.....but never ANY white or leached marine salt). > > This latter modification enabled a rather pronounced synergistic > > effect. Interestingly, we utilized the same unmodified, agricultural > > grade, kelp powder..... which we used in the animal experiments. Our > > bacteriological tests (of these CS containing solutions) revealed no > > viable pathogens extant.....prior to use for the human volunteers. > > While there was little difference in the kelp > > products we evaluted, we settled.....for the bulk of our tests.....upon > > on one called Maxicrop. The reasons being that it gave the best > > solubility results and seemed to evoke more pronounced biological > > benefits----probably as a result of superior extraction/concentration > > techniques. We do not endorse this----OR ANY OTHER---product. These > > were, simply, our particular results under our particular criteria. > > I hope some among you find this of interest. > > Sincerely, Brooks Bradley. > > > > > > -- > > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > > > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: > > [email protected] -or- [email protected] > > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > > > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > >
