Hey Dean, Please clear this up for me. I know colloidal silver is the actual metal suspended in the liquid and ionic silver is positively charged silver atoms. Which one is more beneficial and which one is more detrimental. I've read both sides of the story stating that one or the other is better, but which one really is and how is it proven? I would assume that the silver particles are the beneficial part because of what I've read about the ionic silver being able to combine with other substances such as chloride to form silver salts which is what causes Argyria. Is this right?
Richard ----- Original Message ----- From: Dean T. Miller Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 6:00 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CS>Effects on bone marrow and blood count On Fri, 31 May 2002 12:33:44 -0500, Brooks Bradley <[email protected]> wrote: > The FDA, especially, took extensive measures to cloud the >issue through including the term colloidal silver as embracing generalized >combinations of silver.....but not once providing distinction between such >compounds, and true electrically-generated colloidal silver. We find such >obvious effort to cloud the issue, to be quite reprehensible. Yes, it is. If enough people would start using the term "ionic silver" instead of "colloidal silver," maybe some of the air will be cleared. -- Dean -- from (almost) Des Moines -- KB0ZDF -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
