Hi folks,
Yes, we DO need an independent believable body for lots of things, but I
think due to the danger certain substances are in, some key ones should be
tackled first: CS.
It is not a very big deal to establish a Foundation.
It is not a very big deal to get lots of starters for it - especially those
in a position to materially gain from it.
It is *not* very easy to control that sort of thing.
Let's use some of the intelligence here to do some legwork on it.
I am happy to donate a website to the Cause at once.
Referring to THIS List as its general forum.
AND suggest a serious list for those serious researchers to co-operatively
scientifically collaborate. ( admission by peer group invitation ?)
The Medical Industry holds that you can't even be dead until one of their
franchisees says so.
I personally believe strongly in what they term "anecdotal evidence" vis:
anything that one of the franchisees doesn't say/claim.
I would like to see a pool of ordinary people's experience built up based
on maybe a questionnaire about symptoms and results. Something to give
order to the data.
Then our serious researchers could by peer evaluation determine a "best
practise" set of procedures and principles for the manufacture and use of CS.
It could even then fund itself to the small degree needed by producing the
definitive E-Book for $7.
So?
Cheers,
John-The-Plexor
---
_____________________________________________________
All *MY* communications are certified virus-free. Why not yours?
Ask here for full info - *and* get it free. mailto:[email protected]
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.380 / Virus Database: 213 - Release Date: 24/07/02
