I think the "discrediting" is actually the university distancing itself from the study, and refusing to allow itself to be linked to any reference to a "Brigham Young University study of CS."
----- Original Message ----- From: "James Osbourne, Holmes" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:15 AM Subject: RE: CS>regulations > I did not hear that it had been debunked. I think I have seen some > documents from the study. They are probably calling it proprietary though, > and only published portions of the report are allowed to be quoted. > > James-Osbourne: Holmes > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Roe [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 6:21 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: CS>regulations > > > Hi: > > Hasn't the Brigham Young research report already been debunked? I thought > the university had denied it entirely. > > Ian > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James Osbourne, Holmes" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 7:26 PM > Subject: RE: CS>regulations > > > > Go to argentumresearch.com Find some juicy quotes by Dr. Flick, and quote > > him. Also, find the Brigham Young research report, and quote it. > > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > > >
