Hi all, I've noticed a couple of messages from newer members bewailing the confusing or worrisome technical discussions that have gone on over the last couple of days disputing particle size analysis via TEM, the "corrosive" nature of pure water, specs of neon sign transformers, and so on...
Please don't begrudge our more technically inclined members' use of the list, folks. If something is over your head, it's probably not important to you, at least in this case. Just ignore. Straightforward, simple CS generators and recipes are quite good, with a little patience and practice. Anything more complicated is merely refinement of something that already works. I expect our vendors to understand and accept this position, and support our members efforts regardless *what* method or equipment they choose to use. The technical discussions are ultimately for all our benefit. These people are the "brain trust" that has helped the rest of us learn more about colloidal silver. They're also quite ready to answer simple questions, if you'll only ask them. The line has to be drawn at bickering over commercial issues. I'm satisfied SO FAR that Frank, Trem, and others have 1) kept themselves under control and the exchanges civil, and 2) minimized the competitive overtones of the discussion. I hope that they will continue to be careful, and will agree to disagree as soon as it's obvious where the boundaries are drawn. Be well, Mike Devour silver-list owner [Mike Devour, Citizen, Patriot, Libertarian] [[email protected] ] [Speaking only for myself... ] -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
