Ken:

I agree that'd be the better question!  I certainly don't!

Jason
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ode Coyote" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: CS>Mild Silver Protein


>
>   The better question would be, does ANYONE agree with it.
>
> At 02:45 AM 10/19/02 -0700, you wrote:
> >Does everyone agree with the following about mild
> >silver protein????
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >COLL/AG-40, mild silver protein is attenuated silver
> >that has been broken down into it microscopic
> >particles which are .001 microns in diameter,
> >electrically charged, and are in a colloidal state,
> >bound with a mild silver protein, EDTA which is a
> >chelating agent. It has been re-engineered from the
> >early 1900s with a state of the art space age
> >technology.
> ##Re-engineered means they do the same thing a different way...but it's
> still the same thing.
> ..possibly, binding a particle to a protein stabilizer so it doesn't drop
out?
> If it needs a stabilizer, doesn't that mean it's unstable without it?
>  They are certainly not the only people to sell MSP. Read the fine print
on
> the labels at the store.
> ..wonder why it's in fine print if it's so good?
>
>
>  It is nitrate and nitrate free and has a
> >balanced ph. COLL/AG-40, mild silver protein is
> >non-toxic and now due to the 1994 HATCH ACT is a
> >nutritional mineral supplement.
> ### Labeled as  Supplement not because it IS one but because it can't be
> called anything else and still be labeled.
> >
> >Why our Brand of COLL/AG Mild Silver Protein?
>  ##  Because that's what you're selling?
> >
> >There is considerable information concerning colloidal
> >silver if one wishes to read. There is also
> >considerable misinformation concerning colloidal
> >silver which tends to confuse someone who has not
> >taken the time or does not want to make an in-depth
> >study of colloidal silver. Therefore, let me try to
> >summarize the information so one can tell a good
> >product from a bad product.
> ##IOW,  Now that we've established that you are ignorant, let us feed you
> OUR line.
>
>  First colloidal silver
> >should be a yellow color with a small particle size.
> >If it is made properly, light will reflect a yellow
> >color but if it is made as most competitors make it
> >the particle size is not small enough to reflect a
> >yellow light and it will be a clear color.
>  ## Try, not big enough to reflect yellow light..or..so extremely big so
as
> to reflect all light and not be colloidal at all. [Way past red or violet]
>
>  Regardless
> >of what those who make clear colloidal silver product
> >say it should be yellow. If one does not know how to
> >make it yellow, he does not know how to make it
> >properly.
> ##  Heck , anyone can make yellow CS. That's the easiest thing to do and
> can be done very fast [which is very convenient for a mass producer]
>
> Those who do know how to make it yellow are
> >not going to tell someone how to improve their methods
> >of manufacture to show and prove it to them.
> ##  And those who can only make yellow [or don't take the much longer time
> required to do so] aren't going to admit they don't know how to make
> anything else.
>
>  We have
> >photographed about 23 competing companies with a
> >90,000 power electron microscope and all clear
> >products that we photographed were large particle
> >colloids.
> ##  Is "clear" being used to mean "colorless" ?  Did the 23 competing
> companies use salt? Who chose what products to compare?  What about the
> other 156 or so?
>
>  If someone is making it a yellow color, then
> >the particle size should be acceptable but they need
> >to also incorporate the next two items.
> ##  Which are complete BS
> >
> >Second, colloidal silver should be chelated with a
> >mild protein base or it can't be assimilated properly.
> ##  Apparently, even inhaled silver dust can be assimiliated. It goes out
> the rear end.
>
>
> >Plain colloidal silver is an inorganic product that is
> >repulsed by the colon walls and cannot get into the
> >blood stream unless it is chelated with a free amino
> >acid in the digestive tract.
> ### It lasts long enough in the digestive  tract to get to the colon?
Isn't
> that somewhere near the area that things get 'eliminated' from the blood
> stream? I sure am glad my colon walls can repulse all those toxins and
> prevent their re-entry into my blood stream.  At that point, 'repulsed'
> would mean retained 'in' the blood stream?
>
> All minerals are chelated
> >in some form before one takes the mineral for better
> >assimilation. When it is chelated it can be utilized
> >or excreted depending on the needs of the body.
> >Inorganic minerals are hard on the body causing
> >hardening of the arteries, etc. and should never be
> >taken in volume. Most (about 85%) of chelated
> >colloidal silver is excreted within about three weeks,
> >but acts to stimulate the immune system during this
> >period of time.
> ##  According to the EPA, inhaled silver dust is 94% eliminated within 48
> hrs. "Chelated colloidal silver" sounds a bit more dangerous.
> >
> >Third, all colloidal silver must be energized for it
> >to stay in solution. This can be done several ways but
> >the method of energizing is very important and has a
> >direct affect on the effectiveness of the colloidal
> >silver. Most companies charge the silver by making a
> >coil and putting either an AC or DC charge in the coil
> >and then passing the colloidal silver solution through
> >the coil.
> ## Name ONE.  Whatta load of hooey!
>
>
>  This is not a satisfactory method of
> >charging as it puts the wrong type of electrical
> >charge on the product. This type charge is easy to
> >accomplish but leaves a charge that is repulsed by the
> >body as it is a sign wave and not the proper type
> >charge. Our silver is charged two ways. First, we use
> >a light charge under specific conditions, time, and
> >color. Second, we utilize a patented method of
> >therapeutic charging.
> ##  There are a LOT of patents that just plain do nothing.
>
>  Our manufacturer is the only
> >manufacturer licensed to utilize his methods and he
> >has the only patented method that produces a proven
> >therapeutic charge in a solution.
>  ## Proven by whom to do what? Using a license than no one else cares
> anything at all about? [That you wrote for yourself?]  That would do for
> exclusivity.
>
>  This adds to the
> >effectiveness of the product and you may not only get
> >the benefits of the colloidal silver but you get the
> >benefits of the therapeutic charge as well as the
> >Bovis energy from the light charge.
> ## How would you know? ['cause we're a branch of the  Wesayso Company]
>
>  This patented
> >charge is a Scalar energy which is directed into the
> >solution through his process. This is why he received
> >his patent.
> ## Has scaler energy ever been accepted as 'existant' by science?  Last I
> heard, it was just a theory.
>  Again, patents only mean you had an idea you wanted to document, not that
> the idea works or is useful in any way or even has any basis in reality.
> [not that we know all about reality]
>  Reading the crazy things that people have had patented can be a vast
> source of amusement.
> >
> >Finally, the silver is made in a clean room with
> >filters, UV lights, ozone, washing methods and
> >steralizing techniques proprietary to our operations
> >to maintain a sterile and a high quality product.
> ### WEll, that's cool. Clean won't hurt anything. But, how can something
> that kills nearly everything not be sterile?
> Ken
> >
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do you Yahoo!?
> >Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
> >http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
> >
> >
> >--
> >The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
> >
> >Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
> >
> >To post, address your message to: [email protected]
> >
> >Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
> >
> >List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
> >
> >
>
>