The bowls size and shaping were much the same. From: "James Osbourne, Holmes" <a...@cybermesa.com> Reply-To: silver-list@eskimo.com Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 08:42:29 -0600 To: <silver-list@eskimo.com> Subject: RE: CS>Silver plate-out experiment Resent-From: silver-list@eskimo.com Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 07:45:41 -0700
Which container had the greater surface area of liquid. I'll bet it was the SS bowl, hence more CO2 being absorbed and greater conductivity. Where else could the increase in PPM arise? James-Osbourne: Holmes -----Original Message----- From: Connie [mailto:wufn...@stargate.net] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 7:27 AM To: silver- list Subject: CS>Silver plate-out experiment I just completed an experiment. We often warn pet owners not to use SS, metal utensils for watering when CS is added secondary to silver plate out. My results: I measured several times over a 52+ hr. period. There was nearly 2 c of CS in the stainless steel bowl, 1-1/4 c in the procelain type bowl. They were of comparable size. (No specific reasoning, just how I poured it.) Starting measure of the CS at start was 16.5ppm This was freshly generated, right out of the brewing jar CS, manufactured by my Silvergen SG6 generator. Measured immediately after pouring into the bowls: SS=15.7 Porcelain=16.2 I did cover the bowls with small plates, there should not have been any significant settling of atmosphere contaminants to explain the increasing ppm of the CS water. Time SS Porcelain 3 hrs 14.7 14.6 10 hrs. 13.3 13.2 23 hrs 14.8 13.7 36 hrs 15.8 14.4 48 hrs 19.4 15.3 52 hrs 20.4 17.1 MY conclusion....we no longer need to worry of losing silver ions in the use of SS bowls for communal animal watering. Comments please!! Connie
