Uh-oh, I dunno. Generally speaking, some effects of light energy are
quantized; i.e., they come in whole-number sizes and it takes just the
right amount or size packet of energy to cause a light mediated change in
some chemical reaction: not too much, not too little. I don't know where
uv light fits in relation to the way silver particles react, but suspect
that the major factor is not the light but the silver compound. Take care,
Malcolm
At 01:59 AM 11/3/02 -0600, you wrote:
Not trying to get far afield, but does one using Water Oz also stand a great
greater chance of Argyria when exposed to ultraviolet light or tanning salon
light?
----- Original Message -----
From: Malcolm Stebbins <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 1:26 AM
Subject: Re: CS>Uh Oh...Blue Fingernails
>
> Water Oz Is a form of silver, the msp or mild silver protein sort -
> supposedly, I think. . . . . . Some messages on the list have suggested
> that it really contains silver salts such as the nitrate. It has been
> implicated by some in several reports of Argyria. One aspect of the
> Argyria thing is that the silver particles are 'developed' by strong
> sunshine, turning black just like in a photo.
>
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
