I will Never respond to an off-topic post again. . .
I will Never respond to an off-topic post again. . .
I will Never . . . . .
At 01:10 AM 11/20/02 -0800, you wrote:
<<You call that an attack??
You haven`t seen me when I`m in full-blown PMS.
(Has he, Mike??!! :o)>>
** This is now a valid excuse for being uncivil?
No, it's a threat!!
. . .seems to be an excuse for rhetorical excess, but then you haven't
heard me when I just 'uncivilised' my thumb, either. . . .
<<The swill guy can`t write, spell, or be kind enough to share CS with those
who need it.>>
** So writing and spelling poorly means one can be verbally abused here?
I never noticed that before.
Oh, no; you don't have to write or spell poorly, . . . . I had the
impression you'd noticed that<g>
Are you suggesting he gives away the CS he makes?
a' contraire (ambiguity is as ambiguity does)
<<He thinks his stuff is better than the battery-made CS that
saved my life.>>
** Do you have proof it isn't?
good point,
<<So In my book, he can use an attack or two.>>
** This justifies it?
"Paperss? . . PAPERSS?? We don' got to show you no Stinkin' Paperss!"
<< I remember a few years ago It
was so nice when Mike removed him permanently.>>
** So this would be up to Mike, right?
Why not tell him what offends you about what he is doing?
Uh, that's what she's doing, isn't it?
You get what you give...eventually.
Cute idea, demonstrably not a law of nature, nor of human affairs - though
I'll grant the primacy of a retaliatory instinct.
Catherine
Catherine, you've just Got To relax!<g>
My father had a small sign, pasted to the edge of the shelf above his desk:
Illegitum non-tatum Carborundum
Caritas, M.
