Frank Key wrote: > Marshall wrote: > > > http://colloidalsilver.hypermart.net/silver/faq.html and > > http://educate-yourself.org/cs/csfaq.shtml and > > http://www.maccs.mq.edu.au/~stacey/colloidalsilver.htm and > > http://www.quantumbalancing.com/csfq.htm and > > http://www.n-ergetics.com/FAQ.html > > Silver can be toxic to nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord, but is > normally > > prevented from entering those areas by the blood-brain barrier. > > These links contain information that "define" silver colloids as having > particle sizes being between 5 and 15 nanometers. > > They also claim that the particles have a positive charge. > > Both of these statements are false.
Colloidal silver does generally have particles of from 5 to 15 nanometers. Why do you think that statement is wrong? The part about positive charge, we ALL believed that until rather recently when your zeta measurements indicated otherwise. (Theoretically I still believe the particles DO have a positive charge, and the OH which surrounds the particle has a negative charge that shields the positive charge, and gives the overall particle/OH structure an apparent negative polarity). Marshall > > > Since the writers have demonstrated their lack of knowledge by making these > false statements, why should anything they say be believed. > > frank key > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
