Majority will go for an easy one, which is most likely to be a superficial approach. And if it happens to produce satisfactory results, majority won't even think about the root cause. It's phychology 101. Nothing tough about it.
But maybe it's a good thing they will ignore the root cause. By the time a much more serious disease manifests, they will be old, and if they die, the working generation will save some money. On the other hand, bad health can be tranferred from one generation to the next one, as works of Weston Price, Pottenger and others have shown. The "superficial" folks, provided they reproduce, will harm humanity big time. Roman --- Shirley Reed <[email protected]> wrote: > How about letting the sufferer decide on > treatments? Wonder what they'll go for. hmmmm > tough one __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo http://search.yahoo.com -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
