Hi Bob, > Re: CS>Re: Re: CS>RE: Current limitation Please check my math > From: Robert Berger > Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 17:39:26
> Hi Mike, > A clever solution to the problem of EIS power supplies. > I have a few 330 v c supplies here to check with my wide anode > system. > I believe that Trem is working on a system as a future sales item. > I will look into the NO3 and NO levels. > "Ole Bob" 330 VOLTS? That should get the electrons moving smartly. It should also get UL's attention. They are probably too young to have worked on old vacuum tube radios, and never felt the snap when your finger brushed against the B+ supply voltage. It helped develop quick reflexes:) I'd be very interested in the figures you come up with on NO3 and NO levels. Just for reference, here's your post from last March on this issue: -------------------------------------------------------------------- http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m56865.html CS>NO3 and NO Warning From: Robert Berger Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 13:38:30 Listen-up CS'ers, I just received two samples of CS made with 90 volts DC. I would not call this LVDC but rather MVDC, and they both had serious problems. The CS was crystal clear, one with a very weak T.E., and the other with a medium T.E., both had almost no sparkles. Let me detail the test results and my comments. A 6 hour brew at 90 Volts dropping to 24.5 volts and 3.24 ma. Conductance = 27.5 uS/cc; pH = 5.04; Ag+ = 14.5; T.E. very weak with very few sparkles, and no taste. sound great doesn't it? I could not read the NO3 as something in the brew caused a turbidity to appear in the sample. The NO = 1.44 PPM which is greater than the FDA allowance of 1 PPM. A 31 hour brew at 90 Volts dropping to 5 volt and 5.65 ma. Conductance = 139 uS/cc !!! ; pH = 5.34; Ag+ = 52.8 PPM; Medium T.E. with very few sparkles, but with an after taste. WOW 52.8 ppm, BUT note the NO3 = 5 PPM and the NO = 4 PPM and both show a turbidity during these tests. Before you screw around with voltages over about 37 volts, get someone to check these two items for you, as they are not desireable. No wonder the medical profession has problems with home made cs !!!!! I would only use this material externally. I guess I am "soon old and late smart" as I have not tested other people's CS made with high voltages, but something triggered me to run these tests, which I normally do not do for LVDC, but this is not LVDC!!! "Ole Bob" -------------------------------------------------------------------- It sounds like the generator has a series resistor, but it's not apparent what value is. The above numbers looked a bit strange, so I tried to calculate it. The first run of 6 hrs produced 24.5V and 3.24mA. The series resistance calculates to: R = E / I = (90 - 24.5) / 3.24e-3 = 20,216 ohms The second run of 31 hrs gave 5V and 5.65mA. The series resistance calculates to: R = E / I = (90 - 5) / 5.65e-3 = 15,044 ohms The value of the series resistance should not change with different current levels. So there's something funny going on, but I don't think it affects the readings you took. Best Regards, Mike Monett P.S. A small off-topic question - how many times can you add "Re:" to a thread before the server crashes? -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
