Last month I made a batch with the series2 thermal stir generator that
read 78uS on the PWT. It had/has a very heavy fine gained TE ,very few
'sparklies' , a milky appearance in direct sunlight and a slightly grey
'cast' to it in room light that is not like the "murky" quality that a
batch gone reddish or violet has
Still no 'color' at all.
It now reads 68 uS. There has been some settling over a months time
which the slightest jiggle of the jar it's in redistributes but still no color.
It tastes like rocket fuel!! [me makes awful face]
I'm thinking now that 100+ PPM can be made with LVDC and still have small
particles, but, doing that repeatably is somewhat of a crap shoot.
I have yet to find the point at which the uS stops climbing. Apparently
particles form faster and faster in relation to whatever conductivity is
present but if those particles are stabililized as they form, they don't
agglomerate into larger ones later.
I think the key is to make em real slow and don't let them hang around
the electrodes...and don't impart much kinetic energy to them with high
heat or vigerous stirring that would make them physically collide before
they stabilize.
Perhaps a very low current density prevents the stuff from picking up
too much kinetic energy too?
The thermal stirring I'm using only raises the overall temperature about
5 degrees F.
ken
At 10:49 PM 5/3/2003 -0700, you wrote:
Reid:
It would be hard to say without some laboratory testing being done.
Perhaps Frank Key has some information on the consequence of increasing
actual silver content with a silver compound ( on minute silver particles ).
The ionic portion of the silver will agglomerate, of course, given enough
time. You cannot have a 50 PPM isolated silver with ideal characteristics.
I believe that one will always be sacrificing particle size and that there
would be a consequence on the "hydration"/dispersion.
Will the addition of a silver compound effect the zeta potential, or other
properties?
In fact, it would be interesting to find out why Frank hasn't created a
product that is 10 PPM particulate silver, and about 10 PPM ionic. I've
always just assumed that by doing so, the entire product destabilizes.
Thanks to Trem, I'm in a position to deliver large quantities of quality CS
into the body with relative ease. Of course, I understand that this is not
always the case, especially in your location!
It still comes down to clinical trials to really understand how different
products might work better in the body. Lacking this information, I still
believe that if quality must be sacrificed, it should be only temporarily if
at all possible. A low quality medicinal silver is less effective by
magnitudes, even at concentrations 75 PPM and above.
- Jason
----- Original Message -----
From: "Reid Harvey" <[email protected]>
To: "silver list" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2003 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: CS>Cancer and Silver Crystals -AND PPM
> Jason,
> You mentioned the pros and cons of using dilute and concentrated CS.
> But I asked myself, why is this an 'either or' proposition? Today, when
> gargling CS I tried something a little different. I poured into a glass
> the usual amount for gargling, ~20 ml., in this case the ~10 to 20 ppm
> CS that I made last week. But I added to this three drops of Mexican
> Microdyn, bringing the solution to ~50ppm. (Incidentally adding 5%
> DMSO) Adding to one glass, CS that is both dilute and concentrated, I'm
> going on the theory that the small particles will better penetrate the
> tissue and the larger particles will provide additional contact with
> those pathogens that are more exposed. I assume, of course, that the
> mix has to made at the time of use. Otherwise the small particles may
> become attach to the larger ones.
> Reid
>
> Jason Eaton wrote:
> .............The solution still lies in a basic idea: Isolate and
> eliminate variables.
>
> A low PPM isolated silver produced with a refined method will not be
> effective if it cannot reach the area in the body of concern, and in
> great
> enough concentration, and for a long enough period of time, to be
> effective.
>
> A higher PPM agglomerated isolated silver may be effective in this case,
> but
> not because the product is of greater quality. In such a case, it could
>
> simply be because the concentration of silver is high. In the same
> scenario, this silver may not even reach areas of the body that another
> type
> could............
>
>
>
> --
> The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
>
> To post, address your message to: [email protected]
>
> Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
>
> List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
>
