He used a double negative, thus he said it probably WAS valid. Marshall
Casbah wrote: > You've got me curious now...why is it not valid? > > Ode Coyote wrote: > > > But probably not because the study is not valid.... > > Ode > > > > At 12:34 AM 5/20/2003 -0700, you wrote: > > >Reid: > > > > > >BYU lawyers have been very busy trying to have the study wiped from the > > >face > > >of the Earth. > > > > > >Best Regards, > > > > > >Jason > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: "Reid Harvey" <[email protected]> > > >To: "silver list" <[email protected]> > > >Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 8:28 AM > > >Subject: CS>CS and BYU again > > > > > > > > > > Thanks to all for the links to the BYU studies, but it seems to me there > > > > should be a lot more to it. Upto about a year ago there was a site with > > > > a table that directly compared CS to five popular antibiotics. This was > > > > a very graphic comparison, CS clearly superior. Has this site been > > > > dismantled? > > > > Reid > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > > > > > > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org > > > > > > > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > > > > > > > > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > > > > > > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > > > >
