Below is an article.... Read it or don't. It says that tracking chips will 
randomly be placed on items sold from Wal*Mart, then all stores will have 'em 
on merchandise. It will record your life...... in short. Tell them how you 
live...what you buy...etc...etc. It's the size of a grain of sand, that you 
won't notice. Send a complaint to wal*mart and congress, etc. 
Ice


   
    > NewsWithViews.com
    > http://www.newswithviews.com/
    >
    > BIG BROTHER COMES TO WAL-MART
    > http://www.newswithviews.com/Mary/starrett14.htm
    >
    > By Mary Starrett
    >
    > June 11, 2003
    >
    > Starting this week, the nation's largest discount retailer will quietly
    > begin selling tracking-chipped products to clueless shoppers. The first
    > volley in their war against our privacy is set to start at their Brockton,
    > Massachusetts store.
    >
    > Wal-Mart will put Radio Frequency I.D. sensors on shelves stocked with
    > RFID-tagged Gillette products, but they'd rather you didn't know about it,
    > because, hey, you might not like it, and then you might make noise and
    then
    > they'd have a big PR mess on their hands.
    >
    > You might even stop buying Gillette products or, say, refuse to shop at
    > Wal-Mart.
    >
    > These chips, researched at M.I.T.'s Auto-ID Center are about the size of a
    > grain of sand. Chipsters say the technology will only be used to help
    > retailers keep track of inventory - like bar codes. But privacy-loving
    > consumers question the very concept of a device that sends out radio waves
    > to "readers" that not only identify the article, but where and with whom
    > it's going.
    >
    > The Big Brother implications of this thing need little hyping to get your
    > skin crawling.
    >
    > Wal-Mart's putting the pressure on its top 100 suppliers to make sure
    their
    > inventory is all chipped by the end of next year.
    >
    > But why start this in Brockton, Mass?
    >
    > Could it be because the store's customers are typically lower income
    > minorities who'd be less likely to be aware of the tracking devices, and
    > even less likely to make a fuss about them?
    >
    > Their thinking? Let's foist it on folks who're too concerned about paying
    > the electric bill to be aware of these types of issues.
    >
    > Retailers are SUPPOSED to alert their customers to the tracking chips and
    > offer to "kill" the tags at the checkout counter.
    >
    > Don't count on it, because what you don't know won't hurt you, right? And
    > to PROVE those RFID tags won't be "killed" at the cash register one of the
    > ways they're planning on convincing you, the shopper that these tags are

    > A-OK is by touting how "hassle-free" returns will be. Huh? If the tags are
    > supposedly turned off at purchase, how can they be read after the item's
    > brought back to the store? Just one of the myriad lies you'll be told
    about
    > this technology.
    >
    > Are we to expect that in addition to being asked the "paper or plastic"
    > question we'll get an option on whether the RFID tags are left on or
    turned
    > off? Not only will consumers be witnessing the death throes of privacy,
    but
    > it's going to cost them. Currently, the chips cost about 60 cents each.
    Add
    > that to the cost of each and every item that uses this Orwellian
    > technology. Gillette and Wal-Mart are only the pioneers here, the stated
    > plan is to affix each item produced on the planet with RFID tags. Each
    pack
    > of gum, each roll of film, each bottle of Merlot.
    >
    > So what's a freedom-loving shopper to do?
    >
    > Fortunately for us, there's a really smart lady finishing up a Ph.D. at
    > Harvard. She started a group that's bellowing out the urgency of fighting
    > this technology; her name is Katherine Albrecht and she's founder of
    > CASPIAN (Consumers Against Supermarket Privacy Invasion And Numbering).
    > Albrecht's CASPIAN has proposed a piece of federal legislation called
    "RFID
    > RIGHT TO KNOW ACT OF 2003". It's a law that would let consumers know which
    > products had tracking chips attached to them. In short, the proposed bill
    > would amend the Fair Packaging and Labeling Program by adding language
    that
    > requires manufacturers to state (in a conspicuous location) that the
    > package contains a radio frequency identification tag that can transmit
    > unique identification information to a "reader" device both before and
    > AFTER it's purchased(!).
    >
    > This is where you come in.
    >
    > The bill needs a sponsor.
    >
    > Maybe YOUR Congressional Representative would like to go on record as
    > having helped stop this assault on our privacy. Forward this article to
    > him/her and tell them the entire text of the bill can been seen at
    > nocards.org.
    >
    > Will you make it a point to email, call or fax your representative today,
    > before our Big Brother gets any bigger? Do it NOW before the lobbyists and
    > big money special interests get to them and convince Congress these RFID
    > chips are consumer-friendly!
    >
    > And while you're at it, why not tell the suits at Wal-Mart and Gillette
    > (and Home Depot, Proctor and Gamble and Johnson & Johnson, too, by the
    way)
    > that from here on out you wouldn't go near their stores or their products
    > with a ten foot pole.
    >
    > It works. Remember back a few months when I told you how Italian clothing
    > company Benetton had chipped their Sisely line of clothes and was all set
    > to roll out the garments with RFID tracking devices? Well your outrage and
    > feedback caused them to put the scheme on hold.
    >
    > Let's make sure the behemoth Wal-Mart is similarly put on notice. (By the
    > way, IBM's planning to add RFID to it's products; so if Wal-Mart manages
    to
    > sneak this past us, all bets are off and then every corporate giant will
    be
    > able to inflict this chilling, tracking/monitoring horror on us.)
    >
    > If RFID gets off the ground as planned, that would make George Orwells'
    > predictions off by just 20 years. It's up to us.
    >
    > © 2003 Mary Starrett - All Rights Reserved
    >
    > Mary Starrett was on television for 21 years as a news anchor, morning
    talk
    > show host and medical reporter. For the last 5 years she hosted a radio
    > program. Mary is a frequent guest on radio talk shows. E-Mail
    > [email protected]
    >
    > Additional articles by Mary Starrett
    > http://www.newswithviews.com/Mary/starrettA.htm

        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
       
       

  ********************************************* 
  WWW.PEACEFULMIND.COM Sponsors Alternative Answers-

  HEALING NATURALLY- this is the premise of HOLISTIC HEALTH. Preventative and 
Curative measure to take for many ailments at:
  http://www.peacefulmind.com/ailments_frame.htm
  ____________________________________________

  -To INVITE A FRIEND to our healing community, copy and paste this address in 
an email to them:
  http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/AlternativeAnswers/members_add 

  ___________________________________________
  To ADD A LINK, RESOURCE, OR WEBSITE to Alternative Answers please Go to: 

  http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/AlternativeAnswers/links

  _____________________________________________
  Community email addresses:
    Post message: [email protected]
    Subscribe:    [email protected]
    Unsubscribe:  [email protected]
    List owner:   [email protected]
  _________________________________________
  Shortcut URL to this page:
    http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/AlternativeAnswers 

  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.