On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:26:22 -0500, "Dan Nave" <[email protected]> wrote:
>I don't know about ruining kidneys but the meat eaten by Eskimo's had a >different ratio of types of fat, more omega 3's etc. Our ancestors and >others that have lived off meat (like the Scandinavian explorers who performed >this experiment many years ago) were mostly eating grass fed animals which >will do the same thing. I expect they also ate a lot of organ meat in order >to get enough vitamins, etc. People aren't carnivores. Omnivores, more >likely. Doesn't mean they can't live on meat though, if they're smart enough >to do it right. Okay, I'll post this comparison article/chart. Please note that the length of the human digestive tract is even shorter than that of the dog/wolf/cat (which are considered pure carnivores). That is, a human being is even more of a carnivore than the dog. http://www.second-opinions.co.uk/carn_herb_comparison.html -- Dean -- from (almost) Des Moines -- KB0ZDF -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
