Agreed on all counts.

Hanna doesn't know diddly about CS

Where do you get $20 lab tests with an AA Spec?

Ken

At 01:14 PM 8/21/2003 -0700, you wrote:
>Hi Ken,
>
>Yes, we had our CS analyzed using AA and compared the readings to PWT
>readings to come up with the +20% correction factor.  I think one has to
>keep in mind that our CS always tested 85-86% ionic.  A different
>ionic/particulate ratio would require a minor correction factor change.  But
>after all, this isn't rocket science.  As far as I'm concerned, the PWT is a
>great tool for anyone making CS without automatic shutoff and/or current
>limiting.  One can monitor PPM as they go along.  With auto shutoff it's not
>as necessary but it's still a great tool for the person who wants to check
>the product.  It really beats doing lab tests at $20 a pop.
>
>The TDS meters read about one half because the calibration solution is
>designed to let the meter read one half the ionic content.  If you double
>the reading it will usually come out about the same as the PWT readings
>except it has no decimal.  If you calibrate it with the 84uS solution it
>will then read the same as the PWT and you won't have to double the reading.
>
>Hanna does not use the same correction factor but it doesn't do any good to
>talk to them about it.  We have our differences regarding how to use the
>meters for measuring ionic silver.  They say divide....I say add.
>
>I could be wrong but I'm not in doubt.
>
>Trem
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Ode Coyote" <[email protected]>
>To: <[email protected]>
>Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 5:50 AM
>Subject: Re: CS>Re: HVDC and higher ppm
>
>
>> The history of the conversion factor,
>>  Perhaps Trem should answer this one as he set the standard ...be it
>> accurate or not.
>>
>> My take
>>  Trem made batches of CS and sent them in for AA spectrograph analysis for
>> total silver content, then compared the results to his PWT readings in
>> microsiemens to come up with the 1.2x fudge factor...at around 20PPM for
>CS
>> made the way he makes it.
>>  My experiences say that the TE will vary somewhat, so the fudge factor is
>> only good within a range. I believe that setting an approximate range to
>> get an idea was all that was intended, so it's a  bendy standard but
>plenty
>> good enough for all practical purposes.  TE comes from particle content
>> that meters don't read.
>>
>> Hanna says divide PWT microsiemens reading by 2 [more or less] to get PPM
>> for dissolved solids..they know nothing about CS.
>> Comparing a PPM meter to  PWT meter in the same solution confirms the
>> doubling well within reason.
>>
>>
>>
>> At 12:19 AM 8/20/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>> >url: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m62084.html
>> >Re: CS>Re: HVDC and higher ppm
>> >From: Ode Coyote
>> >Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 06:54:13
>> >
>> >> A PPM meter reading should be doubled for silver ions.
>> >
>> >Hi Ken,
>> >
>> >Any idea where this factor comes from? I've been researching electrolyte
>> >conductivity and came up with some data but nothing for Ag+ and OH-.
>> >
>> >For example:
>> >
>> >  1 PPM of:       Approx. microsiemens/cm (20 C)
>> >  MgSO4           0.80
>> >  MgCl2           1.70
>> >  KNO3            1.10
>> >  K2SO4           1.20
>> >  KH2PO4          0.60
>> >  K2HPO4          1.04
>> >  NaCl            1.64
>> > (NH4)2SO4        1.50
>> >
>> >  http://www.ladyslipper.com/waterq.htm
>>
>> ##  Theses are all dissolved solids right?  I don't really know how
>> straight single element ions of silver compare.
>> >
>> >In this table, cs would get a value of 0.5. This is kind of low, but I
>> >found values that range from about 0.1 to 10 in the "Pure Water
>> >Handbook":
>> >
>> >http://www.konetic.or.kr/attfile/greenCafe/knlgMaterials/62/osmonics.pdf
>> >I'm curious how the conversion factor for cs was obtained. Was it
>> >calculated or measured, or did everyone just agree on some value?
>> ###Some of all of the above but not in that order?
>>  Measured, compared, calculated , then agreed upon as 'maybe so, maybe
>> no'... but it's the best we gots that everbody can use without arguing
>> about whos lab is right, by those who both have and don't have one.
>>
>> ..a benchmark in the park that anyone can sit on when they get tired of
>> trying to figure out where they might otherwise be when it doesn't really
>> matter much anyhow.
>>  WHEW!  LOL
>> Ode
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> >Best Regards,
>> >
>> >Mike Monett
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
>> >
>> >Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
>> >
>> >To post, address your message to: [email protected]
>> >
>> >Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
>> >
>> >List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>