OK and I thank you for the information. Chinese alchemy sources on the internet refer to a red gold. Mesogold is described as ruby red. Is there any parallel with the Mesogold manufacturing process? http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=6388307&dopt=Abstract Outline of the beginnings of alchemy and its antecedents.
Mahdihassan S. There had been a long use of Simples as drugs of longevity. Among these red substances predominated, red ochre and cinnabar as minerals, ephedra bearing red berries and pomegranate and peach as vegetable products. In China herbalism became a cult of longevity with its legendary founder as Emperor Shen Nung and with the god of longevity finally emerging from the peach as Shou-Sing. To excell simple drugs of longevity the first synthetic drug was prepared as brick red colloidal gold. It was called Chin-I. Gold-cum-herbal juice. Dialectally it was pronounced Kim-Iya, whence Alkimiya in Arabic, and finally alchemy. Chin-I was Herbo-golden drug and also gold-making-juice, a miraculous substance. But it was not blood-red. Now came Chin-Tan, Cinnabar-gold, red like blood. Its redness equalled blood and as such was soul, gold as its acceptor had an everlasting body. Chin-Tan was designed as the ideal drug of longevity. Alchemy started by making red gold but degenerated, trying to make bullion gold. Also, from what you're saying Mesogold approaches the monatomic gold talked about on the internet Dan ___________________________________ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Key" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 6:38 PM Subject: Re: CS>Colloidal Gold >>>> most extensive claims and information website > Dan wrote: > > > > What exactly are you calling "hype and claims"? > > > > Colloid size of 9 atoms for their colloidal gold. Is it true or is it > hype? > > I don't know > > That value was determined from a measured particle size of 0.65 nm. Using a > cubic close packing volume reduction of 26%, Dr. Maass calculated that a > particle of 0.65 nm diameter would consist of 9 atoms. > > We like to think of it as science, not hype. > > frank key
