Hi Richard, Interested to read your experience with the Walgreen humidifier it seemed to have worked successfully but I thought someone said not that long ago that this model seemed to filter out the CS, I'm confused, is this amazingly cheap model of ultrasonic humidifier OK, I mean successful at delivering CS vapour or not? Best, Sheila
> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Harris [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 04 November 2003 15:09 > To: [email protected] > Cc: Richard Harris > Subject: RE: CS>Asthma ..Update > > > Hi Mike, > Someone on the list recommended Walgreen's Personal Ultrasonic > Humidifier--about $20. I got one for my son-in-law who had a > B_A_A_A_D cough > along with his several other problems. I gave him a mixture > (some-0ne else's > formula) consisitng of CS 20 ppm w/ Sat. Sol. MSM; pouring off the clear > solution + 20% DMSO 99/9%. This solution proved very efective. The unit is > about the size of a pint jar, begins operating immediately upon > plugging in; > (Up to 4 hours continuous operation on one filling--I believe you'll only > want to use it for 5 minutes or several deep breaths at one time) so is > easily portable. Despite the DMSO to which some object to the > odor, it's not > obtrusive. Someone else also recommended adding a short plastic hose and > breathing short breaths through the mouth to insure most of the treatment > goes directly into the lungs--I feel this to be an excellent idea. > > At any higher price, I don't feel you'll get anything to be more > effective. > Please let us know what you decide on and the effectiveness. > > May your condition continue to improve so you will be able to continue > sponsoring and guiding this most effective, helpful site! > > Best regards, > Richard Harris, 56 yr FL Pharmacist > > > -----Original Message----- > From: M. G. Devour [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 2:03 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: CS>Asthma ..Update > > > Rob writes: > > Hi Helen- > > I bought the mystique ultrasonic nebulizer from portalabs. > > http://www.portablenebs.com/mystique.htm > > > > It looks like the one Jack recommends is cheaper, so if he says that > > works go for it. I have read that an ultrasonic one is the way to go, > > but I don't know for sure. > > I'm looking very closely at the Mystique as well. It seems the > equivalent OMRON ultrasonics are a minimum of twice the price. > > The ultrasonic seems to make the most sense, in terms of noise, for > sure, besides the claimed superiority in droplet size and delivery > rate. Small, portable, AC, battery and DC inputs would all be good > features. > > If anybody has any comments one way or the other I'd like to hear them. > I'll be making a final decision within the next day or two. > > Be well, > > Mike D. > [Mike Devour, Citizen, Patriot, Libertarian] > [[email protected] ] > [Speaking only for myself... ] > > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > > > >
