Hi Mary, very sorry to hear about your doggies problem as we've been there with one of our dachshund. If you have the time please visit my wife's web site where she wrote all about the protocol we used and how successful it was. You'll find it at. http://lbarker.orcon.net.nz/paralysed.html
Hope this helps and good luck. Roger Rotorua, New Zealand on 3/12/2003 11:19 AM, Mary Lou Borgert at [email protected] wrote: > on 11/5/01 4:48 PM, brooks bradley at [email protected] wrote: > DEAR BROOKS > YOU HAVE HELPED ME IN THE PAST. OUR PEKE DOG HAS A PINCHED NERVE IN HIS > BACK AND CANNOT WALK THE VET SAID TO LET HIM REST FOR AWHILE. THIS OCCURED > ON THANKSGIVING. MY QUESTION IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE I CAN DO TO HELP HIM?? > LIKE THE DMSO?? I KNOW YOU ARE NOT A VET, BUT ANYTHING WOULD BE HELPFUL > THANKS > MARY >> We established through direct experimentation (to >> our satisfaction), years ago, the most efficacious approach to a majority of >> gum insults involving almost any bacteria-based insult---included as a >> precursor protocol, some address by H202 or sodium perborate. These agents >> express very powerful subjugation effects on the entire family of >> opportunistic anerobes generally present in the human mouth. Many of our >> volunteers avoided, completely, scheduled "gum-trim" surgery simply by >> following a very simple protocol based upon 3.5% H202. >> Our most pronounced success resulted from a >> combination of H202, followed immediately with a 10 to 15 ppm CS >> swish-and-retain (about 1 tblsp) for 4--5 min......three times daily. In >> these early experiments we did not employ DMSO. Later, we did include >> low-percentage DMSO----with splendid results. Do remember that DMSO is VERY >> bitter....even in low concentrations. Additionally, be advised that our >> volunteers DID NOT swallow the CS X DMSO solutions (although it would not >> have been injurious to have done so). >> I wish to emphasize we DID NOT mix the H202 >> solutions with the CS prior to use----but followed the H202 with the CS. >> Interestingly, we achieved superior results from, always, utilizing the H202 >> first......then using the CS. Speculation on this result seemed to endorse >> that the advantage sprang from a residual bacteria-subjugating effect from >> the CS. However, we did not invest any effort in an attempt to substantiate >> this possibility. Subjects DID NOT rinse their mouth between application of >> H202 and CS. >> One of the outstanding advantages of this protocol >> is it allows "realtime" evaluation of its effects. The subject is aware--- >> in a matter of moments----of both the severity of the bacterial >> insult-----and the degree of response to the H202. This allows for an >> immediate repetition of the H202 protocol.....when indicated. >> I posted information with, essentially, this >> same content.......a couple of years ago. >> Sincerely, Brooks Bradley. >> p.s. This protocol proved effective even in cases where the subjects >> refused to brush their teeth regularly-----some not at all. >> --- Original Message ----- >> From: "Kehoe" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 3:18 PM >> Subject: CS>CS & DMSO >> >> >>> What cautions are there for using CS & DMSO?? I have never used DMSO >> before >>> and I want to make sure I do not do anything stupid. I want to use it for >>> gum disease. Nothing has worked for me so far. I also want to use it for >>> back pain and nerve damage. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> CK >>> >>> >>> -- >>> The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. >>> >>> To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: >>> [email protected] -or- [email protected] >>> with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. >>> >>> To post, address your message to: [email protected] >>> Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html >>> List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> >>> >> >> > >
