You go , Frank.
I see all sort of particle size assertions 'out there' but nothing at all to back them up. It's not hard to figure why that is. Assertions make $$$ Backing them up costs $$$ ..and quite often reduces the assertions considerably. [Not to mention the crow pie factor] Then comes the temptation to spin the results at a very high RPM with confusing language. Ode At 01:28 PM 2/8/2004 -0500, you wrote: >Ode Coyote wrote: > > "Solution strengths up to 200 PPM can be made or higher. Particle size is >limited to .001 micron no matter how strong the solution gets so there is >never a problem with 'current runaway'." > > ## I don't see how one controls the other...small particles means no >current run away? How? > Is that particle size theoretical or actual? > I'd like to see some documentation before I believe that claim. > > >I will offer to measure the particle size distribution and share the results >with this list if someone will send me a sample of this solution. > >frank key > > > >-- >The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > >Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org > >To post, address your message to: [email protected] > >Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > >List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > >
