I was thinking it was "isolated". Marshall
Hank wrote: > Me too everyone, I just can't remember what the I stands for unless it > is ionic, I know what the E and the S means.Yours Hank > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Richard Harris > To: [email protected] > Cc: Richard Harris > Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 4:26 PM > Subject: RE: CS>Brownian Motion > I applaud your support of EIS and vote to adopt this > statement. > EIS is appealing & doesn't have the Rosemary Connotation. > > Sincerely, > Richard Harris, 56 yr FL Pharmacist > > -----Original Message----- > From: Garnet [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 10:18 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: CS>Brownian Motion > > > Gotta agree that the term CS has been bothering me. I feel I > have to > qualify my statements when I tell someone about CS, the > ionic aspects > and all -- and that it makes their eyes glaze over. Really > all people > want to know is does it work and how do I do it. > > Garnet > > On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 20:49, Jonathan B. Britten wrote: > > I second the motion. EIS is a useful term and perhaps we > > > shouldpromote it. "CS" plays into the hands of the > argyria > > scaremongers. Let us make them use our terminology and > then see what > > evidence theycan produce. > > > > > > JBB > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, Apr 13, 2004, at 19:10 Asia/Tokyo, Matthew > McCann PE > > wrote: > > > > Hi, Stuff, > > > > As far as the ionic fractionof EIS is concerned > > (and that would seem to bemost of it,) mutual > > repulsion does homogenize thesolution. So the > > answer to your question isYes. > > > > P.S. I'm really starting tolike the distinctive > > meaning of "EIS." Jasondeserves thanks for > > coining it. > > > > Matthew >
