Hi,

This is not specifically CS however it effects every CS user who eats still
eats food!  Last week we touched upon 'ORGANIC'  The following links will
provide some of the descriptions of the new meaning of the word ORGANIC -
our language is dying - Is there any truth left? or will all words be
deceptive?

Christine

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"If you want to be able to buy organic products you had better act now.
Forward this to your friends and respond yourself. Organic products can be
history before you know it."

From: [email protected]
Sent:  May 05, 2004
Subject: ACTION ALERT: Bush Administration moving to allow corporate
takeover of organics!

GO AT http://www.organicconsumers.org/sos.cfm#action TO TAKE ACTION!

(please forward this important email alert far and wide)

Over the past few weeks America's organic standards have once again come
under heavy attack. First the USDA's National Organic Program (NOP)
announced on April 14 that they would no longer monitor or police "organic"
labels on non-agricultural products, literally opening the door for
unscrupulous companies to put bogus organic labels on products such as fish,
body care products, pet foods, fertilizer, and clothing.

In the case of seafood
<http://www.organicconsumers.org/organic/fish043004.cfm>  and body care
products <http://www.organicconsumers.org/bodycare/index.htm> , the
marketplace is already starting to become flooded with products bearing the
organic label, even though the production methods (industrial fish farms) or
content ("organic" shampoos with organic claims based upon added water) in
many of these products violate traditional organic principles. Besides
giving the green light to bogus organic labels the new USDA "scope policy"
penalizes genuine organic companies that have begun sourcing, certifying,
and labeling their products as organic.

Corporate agribusiness and the biotech lobby have apparently decided that
strict organic farming practices and the booming organic market constitute a
threat to their bottom line, and have called on their friends in the Bush
administration USDA to degrade organic standards and prepare for a
restructuring of organic production so as to facilitate the use of
industrial agriculture practices such as pesticides, antibiotics,
non-organic feed, growth hormones and even genetically engineered animal
drugs.

USDA's NOP announced on April 28 controversial new directives/guidance
statements on national organic standards including:

"Organic" Crops Raised with Pesticides?

The USDA has now stated that as long as the farmer and the organic certifier
don't know the specific ingredients of the pesticides applied to the
"organic" plants, the crops can be sold as "organic". To make matters worse,
it is not required by law for pesticide companies to list the ingredients on
their products (it's considered proprietary information), so the farmers
rarely know what the specific ingredients are.

(Read full USDA pesticide statement at
http://www.ams.usda.gov/nop/Compliance/PesticidesCompliance.pdf)

"Organic" Dairy Cows Injected with Antibiotics and Synthetic Hormones?
The USDA has announced that individual cows can be treated with any kind of
drug at any time, including synthetic growth hormones, but milk can only be
sold from that cow 12 months after that treatment. The problem with this
directive is that it opens up the door for split operation factory style
dairy farms, whereby organic and non-organic dairy operations are carried
out simultaneously, and hundreds if not thousands of "organic" dairy cows
are kept in intensive confinement. Not only are industrial sized dairy farms
bad for the environment, but they inevitably give rise to sick cows who have
to be treated with drugs. Of course many of these drugs build up in the body
fat and are released in the milk and meat from these animals.. If this new
directive is allowed to stand, organic milk could potentially contain
residues of drugs and hormones.

(Read full USDA dairy statement at
http://www.ams.usda.gov/nop/NOP/GuidanceStatements/AntibioticGuidance041304.
pdf)


Mercury and PCBs Allowed in "Organic" Beef?

The USDA also stated on April 28 that non-organic fishmeal can be fed to
cattle and the beef can still be sold as "organic". Fishmeal is used as a
protein supplement on conventional cattle ranches, but it frequently
contains mercury, PCBs and other synthetic chemicals. Mercury and PCBs are
"bioacculmulators" meaning they are concentrated and stored in the "meat" of
the animal.

(Read full USDA livestock feed statement at
http://www.ams.usda.gov/nop/NOP/GuidanceStatements/FishmealGuidance041304.pd
f)

The Organic Consumers Association  is working hard to stop the degradation
of organic standards by the USDA and head-off the takeover of the organic
market by corporate agribusiness and biotech interests. We are now launching
a national campaign called SOS--Safeguard Organic Standards, to make sure
that strict organic standards are maintained and that organic monitoring,
certification, and policing extends to the full range of consumer products,
including body care, clothing, pet food, fertilizer, and other items.

GO AT http://www.organicconsumers.org/sos.cfm#action TO TAKE ACTION!

Organic Consumers Association
6101 Cliff Estate Rd, Little Marais, MN 55614
218-226-4164
http://www.organicconsumers.org