i just have to butt in and say, Garnet, well done....

the trolls have provoked you to show your best thinking....

today, i neutralized an otherwise week long painful and itching lump, from
my first black fly bite of the year....usually my worst...

used the roll on directly, as soon as i felt the pain....

10 minutes later...no pain, big bump, and no rash, even though it was full
strength...

30 min later bump gone...

i did another bite afterward with a CS/DMSO 50/50 mix and it's gone too...

what a great list.....(s)....




> While I have respect for double blind studies I am much more inclined to
> put the most faith in my own personal experience. Generally I start
> there and then look for validation in others experiences and in journal
> articles. However the journal articles often lag behind the personal
> experiences by many years and in some cases hundreds of years. Strictly
> speaking science is observation and requires no double blind studies. If
> it did we would be tossing thousands of accepted medical precepts
> accumulated over centuries of observation.

>
> Part of the problem with viral studies is in defining dead and alive. In
> rereading Goodman and Gilman's section on anti-viral agents in becomes
> clear that this line is not clear when it comes to viruses. Terms used
> in reference to viral affects are not "dead" or "kill", they are
> "inhibit", "uncoat", intereferes with viral replication through affects
> on the RNA or DNA processes and structures and similar descriptions of
> activity.
>
> It becomes clear that the issue of virucidal as regards any anti-viral
> agent is as much a matter of semantics and definition of terms as it is
> of actual demonstration of effects.
>
> DMSO is known to uncoat viruses. It is also known to stop viral
> symptoms. It would appear this is as close as anyone is going to get in
> defining its action against virues. And is a widely accepted level of
> knowledge from which to go forth with therapeutic applications in the
> absence of toxicity. DMSO has zero toxicity in therapeutic applications
> and indeed requires inhalation of vapors upon boiling to some 370* or
> consumption of 40,000 times the therapeutic dose, a highly unlikely
> occurence. It has one of the safest therapeutic indexes (Therapeutic
> Dose divided by the Lethal Dose in 50%) of any agent out there.
>
> Stedman's Medical Dictionary 22nd Ed defines virucidal and viricidal as
> "destructive to a virus". With this definition in mind as well as the
> terminology used by the standard in Clinical Therapeutics, Goodman and
> Gilman, I believe the issue of discussing DMSO's ability to kill viruses
> in vivo (in the body) is hampered by the current concepts of alive or
> dead formed from knowledge of other life forms.
>
> I would also remind those with high levels of curiosity as to the
> mechansims of action of DMSO that many agents are still a mystery to us.
> That does not stop use from using them for situations where we get
> positive results.
>
> I stated that DMSO kills viruses. I stand by that statement.
>
> Garnet
>
>
> --
> The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
>
> To post, address your message to: [email protected]
> Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
>
> Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
> OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html
>
> List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
>