IAHF Webmaster: Breaking News, Codex Emergency, EU FSD, Whats New, What
to Do, All Countries

IAHF List: Greetings from Luxembourg! See the press release below from
ANH. We had a great hearing yesterday in the EU Court of Justice, the
Alliance's lead lawyer Paul Lasok QC performed flawlessly. This really
the beginning, rather than the end of the road. There is a huge amount
to do from here including helping US & European citizens to appreciate
that their ability to chose natural products to manage their health is
still under enormous threat. 

This landmark case brought by ANH is designed to set a framework for
ingredients which can be used in natural products. You'll see in the
press release below, that we must wait until June before the court will
make its final ruling, and we cannot speculate before this time for
obvious reasons. The control of maximum dosages has now been handed over
to the UN and this will now be the key battleground in months ahead. I
will issue another alert tomorrow which includes a wake up call to US
citizens from Rob Verkerk of ANH in an article he just had published by
ACAM. This article should be circulated very widely as it will help
people to connect the dots in this complex international issue.

I'll be back in the USA on January 28th.

ECJ ADVOCATE GENERAL DESCRIBES VITAMIN AND MINERAL BAN "AS TRANSPARENT
AS A BLACK BOX"
UK government decides not to attend court hearing to make its objections
to the challenge

PRESS RELEASE
For immediate release 25 January 2005

EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE ADVOCATE GENERAL DESCRIBES VITAMIN AND MINERAL
BAN "AS TRANSPARENT AS A BLACK BOX"
UK GOVERNMENT DECIDES NOT TO ATTEND COURT HEARING TO MAKE ITS OBJECTIONS
TO THE CHALLENGE
The Alliance for Natural Health today presented its oral submission to
the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg in its landmark case
challenging the ban in the EU Food Supplements Directive on 75% of
vitamin and mineral forms currently sold in the EU market.

Opposing oral submissions were made by the European Commission, the
Council of Ministers, the European Parliament and only one EU Member
State, Greece.

UK Government does not present its objections to the challenge.
Interestingly, neither the UK government nor Portugal attended to
present oral arguments despite having filed Written Observations in the
case. This means that none of the major EU countries felt the need to
oppose the ANH's application for a declaration that the ban in the
Directive was unlawful.

David Hinde Solicitor and ANH Legal Director said:

"Given the vigour with which the UK government resisted this application
at the Judicial Review stage, it was extraordinary it did not now think
the issue sufficiently important to warrant being represented at the ECJ
to make oral submissions. The question inevitably arises whether this
signifies a change of attitude on their part and a retreat from their
previously bullish position about the legality of the Directive." 
Paul Lasok QC, a world leading expert on EU law, representing the ANH
opened the proceedings and systematically undermined the legal and
scientific basis of the Directive, highlighting contradictions between
various arguments put forward by the key bodies involved in developing
the Directive, namely the European Commission, the Council of Ministers
and the European Parliament. 

When asked by Judge Lenaerts as to the origin of the positive list which
appeared to have been derived from an old list produced by the European
Commission, and so omitted a vast array of nutrients that can normally
be found in food, Mr Lasok responded:

"The list was put together without adding, without subtracting and
without thinking."
Advocate General Geelhoed, the senior judge at today's hearing, appeared
to be baffled by the procedure for adding nutrients to the positive
list, which he described:

"As transparent as a black box."
Dr Robert Verkerk, executive director of the ANH said after the hearing:

"It was remarkable that the vast majority of points that we had gone to
great length to show the Court were not countered in any effective way
by the opposing parties. The Commission, the Council and the Parliament
were not able to give any adequate scientific explanations for why so
many forms of vitamins and minerals that naturally occur in foods could
be banned across the EU."
Final judgement expected in June 2005
The Advocate General announced that he would deliver his opinion on 5
April 2005, while the Court is expected to give its judgment in June,
shortly before the ban would otherwise be set to come into effect on 1
August 2005.

ENDS

For enquiries and further information contact:

Alliance for Natural Health
www.alliance-natural-health.org

David C. Hinde, Solicitor, Legal Director
Tel: 0207 738 1640
Mobile: 07958 548 186
E-mail: [email protected]

Dr Robert Verkerk, Executive Director
Tel: 01252 371 275 
Mobile: 0771 484 7225
E-mail: [email protected]

IKON Associates
(PR for the Alliance for Natural Health)

Adrian Shaw
Tel: 01483 535102
Mobile: 0797 9900733
E-mail: [email protected]

Notes for editors:

The Alliance for Natural Health is a Europe-wide association of
manufacturers, distributors, retailers, consumers and complimentary
practitioners who have an interest in food supplements. More
information, including details of members, will be found at
www.alliance-natural-health.org

Good science and good law underpin all of the ANH's work, and the
scientific reports produced by the ANH are endorsed by many of the
world's leading doctors and scientists working in the field of
nutrition.

If the ban on vitamins and minerals is implemented there is much at
stake:

Over 5000 products will disappear from the shelves of UK health stores
as a result of the ban removing access to over 300 vitamin and mineral
ingredients (out of a total of 420). These include amongst others the
main natural forms of Vitamin E, many forms of vitamin C and MSM and
minerals such as vanadium, silicon and boron, all being products which
millions of consumers choose to take as part of their regular health
regime and have done so without any ill effects for many years. 
An individual's freedom of choice to take safe natural health products
will be removed - 40% of the UK's population take vitamins and minerals. 
Products are to be banned with absolutely no scientific justification.
Many of the world's leading scientific and medical experts in nutrition
support this. 
Date: 25-Jan-05
For Health Freedom,
John C. Hammell, President
International Advocates for Health Freedom
556 Boundary Bay Road
Point Roberts, WA 98281-8702 USA
http://www.iahf.com
[email protected]
800-333-2553 N.America
360-945-0352 World

_____________________________
Unsubscribe: http://www.ymlp.com/[email protected]
Hosting by http://www.yourmailinglistprovider.com


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>