> M. G. Devour wrote : > > ... I'm afraid that we'll be forced to leave this debate pretty > > soon... > > I could not agree more.
Thought you might feel that way! <grin> > My claim is that the EMSL challenge tests are done by one of top labs in > the US and clearly show that a representative ionic silver products does > not perform better than a mostly particle product. > http://www.silver-colloids.com/Pubs/EMSL/Ecoli2.pdf Having looked at that report, I'd say that it supports the statement "does not perform better" ... I can agree that the two products appear to perform in similar fashion on those tests... Are these on agar plates or in broth? How is the silver preparation applied or added? One or the other might be a little better at certain concentrations and time points, but all of the plates are clean after a day. > If someone can find fault with the design of the challenge test or the > results, lets address it now. If not, then please stop citing the Quinto > test results as proof of anything. The more carefully (and expensively!) the tests are performed, the more attached the principals become to the idea that they have "proof." I'm afraid that there's little real proof to be found outside of our many anecdotal reports. As long as it works, I'll use it. Particulate, ionic, or both. Thank you, Frank. Be well, Mike D. [Mike Devour, Citizen, Patriot, Libertarian] [[email protected] ] [Speaking only for myself... ] -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
