Good, then it all still makes sense. They are correct that gel would not properly represent the action of a colloid vs. a pathogen, you would likely have reproduced the results that that other company that found that colloid was ineffective because I think they used a gel.
Marshall Info wrote: > At some point recently (I lost track of where the question was asked) > Marshall asked if the EMSL tests were conducted in broth or gel. > > The tests were conducted in broth. The scientists at EMSL did not believe > that gel would properly represent the action of colloidal silver vs. > pathogens. > > Frank Key > Colloidal Science Lab. > www.colloidalsciencelab.com > > -- > The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > > Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] > OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
