-----Original Message----- From: Ed Kasper [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 12:20 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: CS>silver toxicity
It would seem to me that the actual amount of silver does not matter. Most important would be the process of producing EIS or CS. The method and materials should be suspect and examined. It would also seem logical for the man to bring in an actual sample for testing as well as his material and equipment as the fault may lie anywhere. For example it may have been very poor grade silver ... I would have to agree, many are quick to jump at being alarmed when we hear of cases of CS "abuse" to use this word very loosely. Being on this list now for some time and reading the responses from those very experienced and knowledgeable individuals ( u know who u are *smile ); Has given me the insight as to how we are mislead many times from sources of questionable accuracy. How accurate is the information being presented? When we don't know enough, or details are left out completely, it is easy to conjure up a horror story reflecting the misuse of this or that product. When this occurs; not to discount the possibility, it is easy to place blame outwardly. After all we all know how easy that is to do and how much better it makes us feel when we don't have to take responsibility. YES!!! It's called DENIAL!!!! LOL. I am glad to know those who are hear who can straighten out the misconception and propaganda that every so often comes along to add spice into the discussions. :-) Best regards, Ernie -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
