I suggest that we are ALL some kind of idiot. Then we can argue endlessly about who is what kind while using the enormous vagarities of language to convey huge chunks of lack of meaning to prove whatever point we want to.
Meanwhile, things work like they do whether we know how they work or not. [Reality doesn't change due to some theory about a particle of it.] I would further suggest that NONE of us know what ANYTHING... 'really' is. ..regardless of what who believes it is. ode The only difference between a reason and an excuse is that a reason is something that you will accept...usually because it makes your excuses more reasonable to you. At 09:29 PM 7/20/2005 -0400, you wrote: > > > >_______________________________________ >Richard Harris, 58 Year FL Pharmacist >448 West Juniata Street >Clermont, FL 34711 >www.rharrisinc.com >http://www.seasilver.com/reh >http://healthandhealing.blogspot.com > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: alchemy [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 11:23 AM >To: Richard Harris >Subject: Re: CS>Particle theory. > > >Thank you Richard > >I hope you put this on the silverlist because I'm already receiving >direct emails suggesting I'm some kind of idiot! > >David > > > >Richard Harris wrote: > >>Kudos and Thank You to you, David! >> >>You raise questions that many of us have contemplated and await answers as >>we continue to experiment and "practice" our search in Alternative >Medicine! >>I continue to appreciate the CS action that God has given us in this CS >>(Special Gift from God) with which He performs miracles which I have >>witnessed in myself, family and many others. >> >>I feel like the Bumble Bee who Scientists have studied and declared that >the >>bumblebee has too much body bulk and weight and too small wings to support >>it--the bumble bee can't fly! The Bumble Bee in his ignorance does continue >>to fly! Praise God! >> >>Please read my Site and Blog in which I ofer 3 FREE pages of CS Uses and 1 >>page of my Favorites to which I refer often. >> >>Sincerely, >>_______________________________________ >>Richard Harris, 58 Year FL Pharmacist >>448 West Juniata Street >>Clermont, FL 34711 >>www.rharrisinc.com >>http://www.seasilver.com/reh >>http://healthandhealing.blogspot.com >> >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: alchemySA [mailto:[email protected]] >>Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 5:31 AM >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: CS>Particle theory. >> >> >>Unless I've misunderstood things, the popular wisdom at the >>moment seems to be that there are no real silver particles suspended in >>low voltage CS. The theory goes that all these particles are really >>just >>compounds (e.g. oxides) because the only silver is in the form of ions >>that can't reform >>into silver particles. We are also told that low voltage DC doesn't >>have the >>grunt to simply blast solid silver pieces off the wire. >> >>But I was wondering if it's possible that as ions dissolve off the >>electrode they occasionally 'undercut' chunks of solid silver that then >>break off as tiny solid silver colloids. The same way that say a fallen >>log slowly disintegrates in the forest. Some parts of the log virtually >>dissolve or are eaten by termites, til eventually a bigger chunk of >>timber just falls off. >> >>I believe that electricity usually travels on the surface of the wire >>(the path of least resistance?) but molten silver that's been rapidly >>solidified and formed into wire would probably have plenty of weak >>points that allow for undercutting ...maybe even gaps (alternative >>'surfaces') that an electron can travel through. >> >>How else can particles be present in the water to plate the glass or >>float as shiny flakes on the surface? (And are the flakes perhaps lifted >>up there by a rare oxygen bubble that was created during, or mabe even >>helped create, the aforementioned silver wire disintergration?) >> >>Another explanation for these silver particles is that maybe silver ions >>really can turn back into silver particles. All they need to do is to >>pick up a loose electron from somewhere. How hard can that be? With >>electricity running up and down both electrodes, and various chemical >>reactions happening, there must occasionally be an electron that loses >>it's way in all the excitement. >> >>Finally, when the experts dry the CS and do photos with TEMs or SEMs or >>whatever, can they really sort the wheat from the chaff? Can they >>really pick the oxides from the particles (if there are any) or do they >>all look the same? >> >>David >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >-- >The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > >Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org > >To post, address your message to: [email protected] >Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > >Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] >OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html > >List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > > > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.9.2/53 - Release Date: 7/20/2005 > > > > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.9.2 - Release Date: 7/20/2005 > > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.9.2 - Release Date: 7/20/2005
