Sorry, dog and people lungs work the same way and use the same chemistry. If there are any differences at all, they are minor enough for good research to be done, which is why such research is done with dogs by people who HAVE looked into what the differences and similarities are and found the similarities vastly outweigh any difference where some specific application is concerned. Otherise, research would be like Swiss cheese is the same color as the moon, therefore the moon must be Swiss cheese....mice eat cheese, so the holes in Swiss were made by mice and mice made all those craters. Oh wait! That's all true! ..and that half a million miles of vaccuum between mice and the moon is between my ears! No wait! There's no vaccuum if there are rocks in it! I saw an asteroid!
When, not if, people pant, they also evaporate water and cool off. Runners do it often. You're talking about two different ways to use the same system and properties of evaportion. People just have more options. People don't have to pant because they can perspire and evaporate water externally 'as well as' internally through the lungs to refrigerate the blood, but that has nothing to do with how the lungs absorb oxygen and expel carbon dioxide, their basic functions, tissue structures, abilities to handle impurities or how evaporating water refrigerates. If you transplated dog lungs into people, the person would still not have to pant to cool off and wouldn't do so unless the primary system [perspiration evaporation] were overloaded. Saying that a dogs lungs are different because dogs have to pant..while people only 'can' pant to the same effect, therefore particulates take an entirely different route..is like saying that people can't walk because they don't have enough feet. While that might be a sort of sideways 'truth' from a dogs point of view, it's only because dogs don't know much about walking on two feet...and that's not because they 'can't' walk on two feet...most of them just never looked into doing it, those that have don't do it very well and bark out silly arguements against it. [perhaps citing the fact that people who do that tend to fall over more than dogs...those stupid people] BTW, dogs don't walk on their feet. [They walk on their toes] The first bend in a dogs hind leg is its ankle. People can walk on either. People have more options...and a more developed sense of balance. People ride bicycles and 4 wheels don't need good balance to not fall over...but the facts of locomotion mechanics are the same. What's with this "winning" thing? I still have my feet and there is no valid arguement here to win OR lose. If an idea presented is more complete than mine, I'll adopt it in a heartbeat..and keep looking for an even more complete idea. I've heard some people call that 'learning'. Argueing is pointless. No one ever wins anything worth winning. Pinheads argue over whos point is the sharpest. Well, that might be a fun way to waste time, but it doesn't go anywhere. [That's not to say that academia doesn't have its fair share of so called "learn-ed" pinheads] Do some reading or go ask a doctor who has taken both sets apart and actually "looked" and done a 'valid' comparison. ..then... help me change my mind. End of non arguement. Ode At 02:32 PM 8/17/2005 EDT, you wrote: > >In a message dated 17/08/2005 13:33:06 GMT Daylight Time, >[email protected] writes: > >you are wrong again. >dogs are different from humans. >ok? >small particles pass through. >dog lungs are not the same. >a dog pants instead of perspiring. >i fear you are clutching at straws having been defeated again. ><< Subj: Re: CS>Silver particles in the lungs > Date: 17/08/2005 13:33:06 GMT Daylight Time > From: [email protected] (Ode Coyote) > Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]</A> > To: [email protected] > > > > Now that's funny! > ..a person who can't see the most simple correlations won something in a > contest that only that person was in. > Well, that's no surprise. I can race myself and win every time without > even standing up. > Does crossing the finish line with ones left foot mean that the left foot > won the foot race? > I guess so! > I won! I AM my left foot..not my right foot. [The loser!] > > Lookie here. A dogs lungs work so close to exactly like people lungs that > valid testing can be done with them instead of risking harming people. > The effects of unequal meetings of mass and velocity work the same way on > dogs as people...well, OK...people go splat then sue and dogs just go splat. > ..nevermind.. > > I think I'll go look in a mirror to make sure my eyes are shut. -) > > Ode > > > At 09:20 AM 8/16/2005 EDT, you wrote: > > > >In a message dated 16/08/2005 13:42:28 GMT Daylight Time, > >[email protected] writes: > > > >no connection to arguement. > >i win again > ><< Subj >> > > >-- >The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > >Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org > >To post, address your message to: [email protected] >Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > >Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] >OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html > >List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > > > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.11/74 - Release Date: 8/17/2005 > > > > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.11 - Release Date: 8/17/2005 > > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.12 - Release Date: 8/17/2005
