In a message dated 18/08/2005 17:20:41 GMT Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:
your compariso is inept and not germane. we are talking about particles going through lung tissue or not... but you have all clearly evaded this issue to concentrate on dogs and cars and transplants. gracefully concede i was right and you were wrong. << Subj: RE: CS>Silver particles in the lungs/reply2 Date: 18/08/2005 17:20:41 GMT Daylight Time From: [email protected] (Ernie Patai) Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]</A> To: [email protected] Hi, I would like to add to this "conversation" re: the comparison of human lungs to dog lungs; Although, I know very little about the structure of "dogs" lungs. We should agree that a dog is a mammal and because he is warm blooded creature would process oxygen in a "similar" manner as humans, Regardless of whether he pants or not. We all remember science class, back in the day asking us what characteristics make up a mammal right? With this being said; I would have to agree with Ode. His explanation seems to be the most open minded. The lung of a dog may be physically different, and based on its genetic make-up in fact may not work in a human body. Take a car for example. (this may be a crude one in comparison) but if you were too take a "motor" from a very small car, And transferred it into a full sized Cadillac. One would still have a running motor but probably wouldn't be very successful in moving the caddy only because of the power to weight ratio. Eventually pushing the motor to move this car would result in fatigue and it would eventually quit or seize. Both cars have internal combustion engines and work off the same operating principle. Even though it can be modified to fit doesn't mean it will be successful in creating inertia. Both need air and gasoline to produce combustion = power. However, we are speaking of organic material here. But still keeping in mind the principle of the lung in a land mammal. Regards, E look you are spoiling my victory. dogs are not the same as humans.and their lungs are biologically different from humans. i can prove this. if you tried to transplant a dog lung to a human it would kill the human. dog are not the same as humans. you are confused by the fact that humans keep dogs as pets and you think therefore dogs are the same as humans. this fuzzy emotionalism on your part is making you look like someone who is a creationist. Ode wrote: Saying that a dogs lungs are different because dogs have to pant..while people only 'can' pant to the same effect, therefore particulates take an entirely different route..is like saying that people can't walk because they don't have enough feet. While that might be a sort of sideways 'truth' from a dogs point of view, it's only because dogs don't know much about walking on two feet...and that's not because they 'can't' walk on two feet...most of them just never looked into doing it, those that have don't do it very well and bark out silly arguements against it. [perhaps citing the fact that people who do that tend to fall over more than dogs...those stupid people] __________________________________ -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> ----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from rly-xn04.mx.aol.com (rly-xn04.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.117]) by air-xn02.mail.aol.com (v107.10) with ESMTP id MAILINXN24-6414304b54ab1; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:20:40 -0400 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (ultra5.eskimo.com [204.122.16.68]) by rly-xn04.mx.aol.com (v107.10) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINXN41-6414304b54ab1; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:20:28 -0400 Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smart...@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7IGJYH2013606; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:19:50 -0700 Received: (from smart...@localhost) by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.13.4/8.12.10/Submit) id j7IGJXmw013599; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:19:33 -0700 Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:19:33 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to [email protected] using -f Message-ID: <[email protected]> X-Originating-IP: [70.49.177.122] X-Originating-Email: [[email protected]] From: "Ernie Patai" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Subject: RE: CS>Silver particles in the lungs/reply2 Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:19:08 -0400 Message-ID: <001101c5a410$90cccca0$657ba...@ernie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-reply-to: <[email protected]> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Aug 2005 16:19:12.0101 (UTC) FILETIME=[91B66950:01C5A410] Resent-Message-ID: <[email protected]> Resent-From: [email protected] Reply-To: [email protected] X-Mailing-List: <[email protected]> archive/latest/84445 X-Loop: [email protected] List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]> List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> Precedence: list Resent-Sender: [email protected] X-AOL-IP: 204.122.16.68 X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:497792120:15032385 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 >>
