Hello,

I am only recently learning about NAET.  There is no one in my county that does 
NAET.  I just left a message for the nearest NAET practitioner to see what her 
rates are.

I just came across this website  
http://distanttreating.homestead.com/FreeTreatment.html  What do you think 
about the feasability of doing NAET treatments long distance?  I sent him an 
e-mail a couple of days ago asking for the free allergy elimination for my 
husband's cat allergy.  If he could eliminate that allergy we would all be 
believers!  Sadly, I haven't heard from the practitioner yet.

Thanks for your comments.

Blessings,
Lea Ann
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: [email protected] 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 9:59 AM
  Subject: Re: CS>Pediatricians firing patients


  Vaccines sometimes are worthwhile.  Yes, they can cause debilitating 
symptoms.  Yes, there is a cover-up about the mercury preservative and other 
factors in the vaccines causing these symptoms.  Can you imagine what would 
happen if all the parents united to sue the vaccine makers for the damage that 
had been caused?  What about those who contracted AIDS that was planted in the 
hepatitis vaccine?  What about the 50% or so of people in Africa who are dying 
from AIDS that was deliberately placed in the smallpox vaccine?  The truth 
about vaccines simply can't be allowed to surface.  Can we really expect our 
mainstream medical providers to go against their training, against AMA which 
could remove their licenses, or against the pharmaceutical giants, against Big 
Brother who eliminates dissenters and who is beyond the law and beyond ethics.

  If I had a young child now (my two were both affected--autism, ADHD, etc.) I 
would treat them with the NAET (Nambudripad Allergy Elimination 
Technique--www.naet.com) that both effectively prevents, or removes, the 
effects of these vaccinations.  If a vaccination were unavoidable, or helpful, 
then I would muscle test to make sure the child would not be adversely affected 
by it.  If muscle testing showed they would be harmed, I would have them 
treated with NAET using a vial of the vaccine until they muscle tested no 
longer sensitive to it.  Then it would be completely safe to give them the 
vaccine, and there would be no ill effects. 

  I personally wouldn't have a flu shot (Bird flu, or any other kind) until I 
was muscle tested to see if the results would be favorable.  With the Bird flu, 
I would be concerned that the vaccine would be the intended means of spreading 
this pandemic, and not the touted prevention!  If, however, muscle testing 
showed the vaccine would be helpful, I would test for any sensitivities to it, 
and if there were, would treat with NAET until these were 100% removed, and 
THEN take the vaccine.  

  Obviously, all this media hype about Bird flu is intended to motivate us with 
fear to do what we think will protect us (but which is the true danger).  In 
order to figure out why something is being done, I look to the result; that is 
what was intended to be achieved (Consider 9-11 in this regard).  As a medical 
provider, I just got a list (in duplicate) from the Dept. of Public Health of 
vaccines offered at a discount.  They are really pushing vaccines right 
now--perhaps to get us ready to beg for the Bird flu vaccine.  

  It's very difficult to find an M.D. who will go against the power 
establishment, and usually impossible to keep the child out of schools where 
vaccinations are required, but with NAET our children will not be harmed.