I was sick so I figured I would try the Ameriden based on the higher % of oleorupin. I went through three bottles with no discernable benefit. Usually if I take a handful like 5-6 with Eastpark I will get some die-off when I'm sick like fever/chills which tells me it's kicking the germs. I felt nothing with the Ameriden and wasn't getting any better. This is just me, maybe others have had a different experience. When something works for me I stick with it or in this case go back to it. Your mileage may vary.
Steve Please note: message attached
--- Begin Message ---Damn, I already ordered it from Ameridan! I wonder if I can "return to sender". Can you tell me How Much Better? Susan "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: I bought Ameridan OLE thinking since the potency was higher it would be more effective. It wasn't. I don't understand why it wasn't as effective but that's how it went for me. So I stuck with Eastpark since it worked the best. Maybe they have a different way of processing the OLE. In any case that's my experience. Also their Flu-Ban homepathic combo with OLE usually will stop a beginning virus dead in it's tracks. Good stuff. Steve Please note: message attached From: [email protected] Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 09:57:01 EST Subject: Re: CS>CS or Olive leaf? To: [email protected] Ameridan Olive leaf surpasses East Park's on live blood cell analysis and independent trials. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? With a free 1 GB, there's more in store with Yahoo! Mail.
--- End Message ---
