Thanks Mike for applying so much clarity to this issue. I think you have described it exactly right.

Calculating the total silver released into the solution, or at least the maximum possible, based on watt-seconds was the basis of Bob Lee's and Mike Monet's posts indicating how to calculate the amount of silver in the CS (Faraday's equations of electrolysis, I think...)

This is what I used to determine the amount of time to run my 1/2 gallon of CS when I make it with a constant current system but no conductivity sensor. I did the integration of the current before the current limit kicked in, and after that I had a constant current situation which could be regulated for ppm by the time of brewing. This works quite consistently for a known brewing cell with a known distilled water.

The thing that's bothering me is illustrated in Ole Bob's graph of the "Effects of Initial Conductance on Brew Time" on page 8 of his CS book.

One brew, starting with higher conductivity water, took 45 minutes, the other,starting with lower conductivity water, took 120 minutes. Both brews ended up with the same general silver ion ppm. However, the first one required 244 watt-seconds and the second one took 348 watt-seconds to get to the same silver ion concentration. This was a polarity switching cell; what happened to the extra liberated silver? The graph says very little tyndall. This implies that it is more efficient to start with higher conductivity distilled water and brew for a shorter time at higher current than to start at a lower conductivity DW and brew longer at a lower current!?...

Dan

(What? You don't have a copy of Ole Bob's book? Get your a$$ in gear and get one right away! You don't know how long they will be available!... I just bought two more - I had given one away, and now I have one to keep and one to loan out. ;-))


M. G. Devour wrote:
Bob writes:

Power factor becomes a problem in alternating current systems, NOT
switched DC systems. It involves the phase angle bewteen the voltage and
current in the system.


Bob's right, in that the term Power Factor has a specific meaning in alternating current systems with reactive loads, neither of which apply in a typical low voltage CS generator, no matter how sophisticated or simple its design.

I think the original person (Wayne?) who suggested "Power Factor" was simply thinking of the relevance of voltage and current -- which, when multiplied together gives you the power being dissipated in a circuit -- to the making of CS. I think the most relevant answer was alluded to early on on this thread, probably by Bob, again, that if you integrate the current driven through the generating cell, you'll get a number which is very closely related to the total amount of silver that's been put into the water.

You can think of this integration process as adding together the current reading every second for the duration of the run. You'll get a figure in milliamp-seconds or amp-seconds. Multiply each reading by the corresponding voltage reading, you'll get a value in milliwatt-seconds or amp-hours, both of which are a measure of work.

There might be a lot of information that a careful researcher could tease out of such readings and calculations regarding the form the silver takes in the water in response to applied voltage, relative to surface area, geometry, initial purity, and other factors that affect the process. In fact, Bob has done a lot of just that sort of study.

It's easy to confuse matters when one innocently attempts to express an idea with a term that sounds right but already has another, precise but totally different meaning.

Be well,

Mike D.

[Mike Devour, Citizen, Patriot, Libertarian]
[[email protected]                        ]
[Speaking only for myself...               ]


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.5/322 - Release Date: 4/22/2006


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: [email protected]

Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>