Peter M. Stellas wrote:
Julius,
This question is to you, and anyone who knows the correct answer. In
your post, you state . /...... "Sheet electrodes are greatly
superior to /
/wire as far as we are concerned because of the greatly enhanced area/
/& we believe that this produces a greater proportion of ICS. We have /
/seen medical reports that ICS is much more deadly to pathogenic /
/organisms than the de-ionized CS. 700 + organisms at last count
.".........../
Others have posted that wire is superior, because sheet stock causes
buildup of silver oxide at the sharp edges. Also, I note that most of
the commercially available CS generators, except the silver-gen, are
constructed with wire electrodes. A vendor of an engineered CS
generator argues that sheet stock is the cheap way out that his
competition has chosen. You see that there is much contradiction and
confusion here.
Would someone who knows the facts please state them in a definitive
way so that all of us newbies can construct a good generator? Which is
really best?
Sheet or Wire????
Peter
They both work. Sheet has the advantage of more square inches of
surface area in a small size, wire has the advantage of not having any
sharp edges. Either can be made to work satisfactorily. If nothing
else, one can put trim on the edges of the sheet with grommet and get
rid of the edge effects. If the sheet is fairly large (I use 4" X 8")
with respect to the spacing between them (I use 1"), then the edge
effects are minimized since the vast majority of the EIS is produced on
the sheet faces. Or the edges could be rolled over or near the edges of
the container, also minimizing the effect.
Marshall
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
