Thanks, Jodi. That's what I thought. So hopefully, I won't turn blue this summer! Lisa
> [Original Message] > From: Jodi W Menard <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Date: 2/28/2007 11:28:40 AM > Subject: Re: CS>new member introduction > > Lisa wrote on 2/28/2007, 10:17 AM: > > > The link you had in your note is the silver maker that I use. Am I > > making what you guys call "EIS" with this generator? Assuming I use > > good distilled water, of course. > _______ > > Hi Lisa - > > I believe all of us home users with generators are making EIS > ('electrically isolated silver' in distilled water). In order to make > actual CS (colloidal silver), someone here once mentioned that we would > have to buy $15,000 in equipment and have our 'lab' FDA approved! > > The difference between EIS and CS is that the CS has more silver > 'particles' (atoms) and less ions (silver ions have one electron missing > which allows it to bind with any other atom in our bodies). Whereas the > EIS we make at home has more silver 'ions' and less particles. > Supposedly, particles are not as easily assimilated by the body, whereas > ions are assimilated and completely bioavailable. Ingesting silver ions > as opposed to particles is comparable to getting your iron from a bowl > of spinach, as opposed to actually swallowing minute particles of iron > or taking an iron pill. The nutrients we get from the vegetables we eat > are in ionic form, for example. If they're ionic that means your body > can transport that nutrient wherever it is needed in the body, and then > get rid of any excess more easily. I don't think it is actually a raw, > heavy metal when it's ionic, and this is one of the reasons why if you > were to buy real CS, say like Mesosilver (a very high quality CS and the > only 'CS' that I have ever recommended), you'd take much less than what > you could or would if you took the EIS that we make at home with > generators. > > There is also a debate in the CS/EIS comunity where the CS side says > that particles are better and more effective, and the EIS side says that > ions are at least as effective and better, but I don't think the final > results are in. I personally think it doesn't matter which you take, as > long as you take one or the other, but the EIS is much more affordable, > and probably much easier on the body. > > If I've got any of this wrong, I'm hoping one of the experts here will > chime in and correct me. [grin] > > Jodi > > > > -- > The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > > Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > > Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] > > The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> >
