Revision: 1803
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu Dec 31 11:12:01 2009
Log: Add a couple more legal questions
http://code.google.com/p/simal/source/detail?r=1803

Modified:
   
/trunk/uk.ac.osswatch.simal.ssmm/src/main/uk/ac/osswatch/simal/ssmm/LegalQuestions.java

=======================================
---  
/trunk/uk.ac.osswatch.simal.ssmm/src/main/uk/ac/osswatch/simal/ssmm/LegalQuestions.java
  
Thu Dec 31 09:34:50 2009
+++  
/trunk/uk.ac.osswatch.simal.ssmm/src/main/uk/ac/osswatch/simal/ssmm/LegalQuestions.java
  
Thu Dec 31 11:12:01 2009
@@ -30,9 +30,28 @@
                options.put("OSI", "The licence used has been approved by the 
Open  
Source Initiative.");
                options.put("FSF", "The licence has been recognised by the Free 
Software  
Foundation as a Free Software License");
                options.put("FSF and OSI", "The license is recognised by the 
FSF and by  
the OSI.");
-
            MultipleChoiceQuestion question = new 
MultipleChoiceQuestion("License  
type", "Is the licence recognised as a common Free and Open Source  
licences?", "If the licence has been recognised by either of these bodies,  
it is more likely to have been assessed and found to be relatively open  
than a new licence or one which has not been OSI or FSF approved.",  
options);
                put(question.getLabel(), question);
+
+               options.clear();
+               options.put("Don't know", "It is not fully understood who has 
the right  
to run the software");
+               options.put("Specific Group", "Only some specified group may 
run the  
software (i.e. restricted exclusively or proprietary) – e.g. free for  
education only.");
+               options.put("Specific Use", "Anyone but for some specific 
purpose or but  
some specific group (i.e. restricted inclusively) – e.g. no commercial  
use.");
+               options.put("Anyone", "Anyone may run the software.");
+               question = new MultipleChoiceQuestion("Permission to run", "Who 
has  
permission to run the software?", "If the right to run the software is  
limited, that limits the recipient base of the software and thus openness  
is limited.", options);
+               put(question.getLabel(), question);
+
+               options.clear();
+               options.put("Don't know", "The documented dependencies have not 
been  
verified independently");
+               options.put("No", "There is at least one dependency that has 
not been  
correctly documented");
+               options.put("Yes, no audit process", "Yes, but the audit 
process is  
undocumented. This means that undocumented dependencies may be introduced  
at any time.");
+               options.put("Yes, separate audit process", "Yes, and there is a 
 
documented audit process. However, this process is not integrated with the  
release management process");
+               options.put("Yes, integrated audit process", "Yes, there is a 
documented  
audit process which is an integrated part of the release management  
process.");
+               question = new MultipleChoiceQuestion("Documented 
dependencies", "Are  
all project dependencies clearly documented and licence compatibilities  
audited?", "Crediting dependencies and conforming to their licence  
requirements is critical to ensuring the project conforms to all legal  
requirements placed on a FOSS project.", options);
+               put(question.getLabel(), question);
+
+               // FIXME: done up to , and including, Legal Q2 in  
http://pipka.org/misc/Foundations-of-openness-V2-release.odt
+               // Q3 in  
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AsvIGTEZElqhdGFMQi1qendNTFNtc184NFhxNFVaOUE&hl=en
        }

  }

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Simal Commits" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/simal-commits?hl=en.


Reply via email to