On Thursday, April 11, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Gérard Calliet wrote: > Le 11/04/2013 19:37, Michael Mondy a écrit : > > I guess there are two types of questions when talking about ways to > > extend or improve SimH. What would be useful to current users? > > What would be useful to current developers? What would be useful for > > new users? What would be useful for new developers. Ok, that's > > four... > Hello, > > I'm just a new user. For me simh is the better way to give to VMS customers > the opportunity of going on with VMS. > > I explain : commercial emulators all use Windows, so customers who have a > lot of software on alpha/ia64 OpenVMS, and some on VAX/VMS buy these > WIndows emulators, buy Intel hardware, and think about migrating all to > Windows. Windows as a convergence platform. Not so good. > With simh (vax) on OpenVMS / ia64 there is only one platform, and only one > OS. OpenVMS as a convergence platform. Better. > > It would be interesting to have improvements on specific implementations > on OpenVMS : better use oh io system, better network integration...
It is not clear what you are asking for here. Do you want to run a VAX simulator on a OpenVMS ia64 host? What do you mean by 'io system" and 'network integration'. Please be more specific. Thanks - Mark Pizzolato _______________________________________________ Simh mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh
